Personal blog, written from my various perspectives: parent; elected Lexington Town Meeting Member (2006-2021); issues advocate and activist; board member Media Literacy Now (2013-2020), Progressive Democrats of Mass, and Parent Representative on the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education. Older posts go back to Lexington School Committee (2009-2014) and Massachusetts PTA President days (2008-2012). Blog content mine, unless otherwise attributed. All comments moderated.
Showing posts with label Massachusetts. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Massachusetts. Show all posts
Monday, September 9, 2019
On the Road Again
This month, BESE kicks off the 2019-20 school year. A recent communication from Commissioner Riley's office informed the Board that the Tuesday, September 24, 2019 Regular Meeting will be held at Taconic High School in Pittsfield.
When Katherine Craven was with Massachusetts School Building Authority (MSBA Executive Director 2004-2011), she said that having monthly meetings in school districts across the state provided her with a valuable perspective. When Governor Baker appointed her Chair of the Board last March she said she would bring that practice to BESE meetings .
True to her word, our first meeting on the road was last June in Revere. It was held in Revere Public Schools' new Rumney Marsh Academy middle school.
There will not be a Special Meeting on Monday night, September 23.
The Board's September Agenda is not yet posted.
Thursday, August 22, 2019
Ranked Choice Voting
![]() |
| Training for RCV signature gathering at Robbins Library in Arlington MA | Photo: mas |
More and more we're seeing one or more ballot initiatives being used as a tool by citizens for action in the Massachusetts legislature, which in turn means turning out for training on messaging and signature gathering.
Last night I attended a training on Ranked Choice Voting (RCV) at the Robbins Library in Arlington, presented by Voter Choice Massachusetts (VCMA). Their petition awaits approval from the Attorney General, along with about a dozen others. If approved, VCMA's current legislative proposal would need to be acted upon by legislators by next spring.
VCMA is advocating for the expanded use of RCV, which allows voters to rank the candidates on the ballot in order of preference. The effort, if successful, would make Massachusetts elections more competitive and fair by encouraging the participation of more candidates and parties, and by ensuring outcomes that more accurately reflect the will of voters.
Those of us who have gathered signatures for ballot initiatives are familiar with the process. If approved, RCV signature sheets become available. The legal process requires submitting 80K certified signatures, which means submitting many more than that, and not more than 25% of signatures may come from any one county in the state. See this guidance document from the Massachusetts Secretary of State.
In a nutshell, this petition, if passed in 2020, would see RCV implemented for the 2022 ballot. RCV is a simple upgrade to the way we vote. Currently, in a field of multiple candidates, we get one chance with our vote; that choice may not gather 50% required for the win. With RCV you can set your preferences and order your choices; if your first choice doesn't get 50%, your subsequent choices are activated until one candidate secures 50% of the electorate.
Cambridge adopted RCV in 1939. More on that HERE.
Signatures would need to be returned to City and Town Clerks by November 20, 2019 and the deadline to submit to the Secretary of State by December 4, 2019.
We will hear more about this initiative very soon. Stay tuned.
Saturday, February 2, 2019
Education-related Legislation Enacted in the 190th Session
In a Memorandum from Commissioner Riley to the Board, we received details about the education-related laws enacted in the last legislative session (190th General Court of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts). I'm posting them here; the Memo may be downloaded from the Department's website here: agenda item #8.
- - - - -
The following laws
relating to the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (Department) have
been enacted during the 2017-2018 190th Legislative Session. The
laws are listed in chronological order of enactment.
LEGISLATION
An Act relative
to relative to the Mohawk Trail
Regional School District and the Hawlemont School District
This follow-up legislation to a 1993 law was filed to confirm the Mohawk Trail Regional School District’s budget process and their right to approve future amendments in accordance with law and the terms of their agreement after the participating towns approved a change in their regional agreement.
Sections 47 to 54 shall take effect on 05/01/18
An Act relative to language opportunity for our kids [LOOK Act]
Sections 47 to 54 shall take effect on 05/01/18
The new LOOK law establishes language acquisition programming flexibility for districts and oversight requirements for the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Provides districts with flexibility in choosing a language acquisition program that best fits the needs of their English Learner (EL) population, while ensuring accountability through Department oversight.
Requires districts that intend to offer new programs for ELs to submit specific information for review by the Department and the district's parent advisory council. All programs must be based on research and best practices.
Directs the Department to notify a district and provide the corrective steps that a district must take before commencing a program if the Department finds that a proposed program fails to meet the applicable requirements.
Districts that intend to offer a new sheltered English immersion or alternative instructional English learner program in the next academic year must submit the required information to the Department and the district's parent advisory council by January 1 of the current academic year, which means new EL programs may open no earlier than the 2019-2020 school year.
Increased Input from Parents and Guardians
Requires districts that serve a significant population of ELs to create EL Parent Advisory Councils, made up of parents/guardians of ELs in the district.
Requires districts to provide notification to parents/guardians of ELs regarding various topics, including their right to choose a language acquisition program among those offered by the district.
Parents/guardians of ELs may select any language acquisition program offered by the district, provided that the program is appropriate for the age and grade level of the student.
Parents/guardians may request a transfer of the student to another language acquisition program available in the district, subject to approval by the superintendent.
Educator Qualifications
Requires the Department to establish licensure endorsements for various language acquisition program types (for example, Two-Way Immersion Programs).
Requires the Department to annually provide districts with reports of all educators who have current language acquisition program endorsements.
Requires districts to verify, prior to the beginning of each school year, that each educator in an English learner program is properly endorsed for that program.
Benchmarks, Guidelines and TemplatesRequires the Department to establish: (i) benchmarks for attaining English proficiency for ELs; (ii) guidelines to support districts in identifying ELs who do not meet benchmarks; and (iii) an EL success template for use by districts to assist ELs who are not meeting English proficiency benchmarks.
Requires districts to provide a copy of these materials from the Department to parents/guardians of ELs within the timeframes specified in the law.
Requires districts to adopt procedures to identify ELs who do not meet the English proficiency benchmarks and establish various processes relating to them.
Requires the Department to establish licensure endorsements for various language acquisition program types (for example, Two-Way Immersion Programs).
Requires the Department to annually provide districts with reports of all educators who have current language acquisition program endorsements.
Requires districts to verify, prior to the beginning of each school year, that each educator in an English learner program is properly endorsed for that program.
Benchmarks, Guidelines and TemplatesRequires the Department to establish: (i) benchmarks for attaining English proficiency for ELs; (ii) guidelines to support districts in identifying ELs who do not meet benchmarks; and (iii) an EL success template for use by districts to assist ELs who are not meeting English proficiency benchmarks.
Requires districts to provide a copy of these materials from the Department to parents/guardians of ELs within the timeframes specified in the law.
Requires districts to adopt procedures to identify ELs who do not meet the English proficiency benchmarks and establish various processes relating to them.
Data and Reporting
Expands EL related reporting requirements for districts to the Department.
Establishes a data commission to study the collection and dissemination of data on ELs and to make recommendations on streamlining data reporting.
Expands EL related reporting requirements for districts to the Department.
Establishes a data commission to study the collection and dissemination of data on ELs and to make recommendations on streamlining data reporting.
State Seal of Biliteracy
Directs the Board to establish the State Seal of Biliteracy. Districts may award the seal to students who meet the state criteria in attaining a high level of proficiency in English and at least one other language.
Directs the Board to establish the State Seal of Biliteracy. Districts may award the seal to students who meet the state criteria in attaining a high level of proficiency in English and at least one other language.
Pre-K English Learners
Expands the student census requirement for districts to include ELs who are in Pre-Kindergarten
Expands the student census requirement for districts to include ELs who are in Pre-Kindergarten
An Act relative
to standards of employee safety
Chapter 44 of the Acts of 2018 has impact on school employees in Massachusetts, particularly in the context of lab safety in science classes. In brief, Chapter 44 requires that schools comply with federal Occupational Safety and Health Act (“OSHA”) standards of workplace safety by expanding the scope of a statute, G.L. c. 149, § 6½, that currently mandates OSHA compliance only for workplaces within the state government’s executive branch. School employees are already protected by a more general workplace safety statute, G.L. c. 149, § 6; however, § 6 is phrased in broad terms, while Chapter 44 provides a more concrete list of requirements that public sector employers must satisfy.
Chapter 44 does not directly apply to students, although any requirements dealing with the physical work environment of teachers or other school staff would naturally affect them as well. Should they desire more direct guidance, schools will be able to request an inspection by the Department of Labor Standards (DLS).
Effective: 10/31/18
An Act relative to criminal justice reform
Effective: 04/13/18; 07/12/18
The Criminal Justice Reform Act of 2018 included several sections that affect schools, districts, and students. The Act:
Establishes a childhood trauma task force to identify school-aged children who have experienced trauma, and to make recommendations on treatment services.Requires certain criteria in the process for school resource officer (SRO) selection.
Establishes standards for the memorandum of understanding between a district and public safety entities for SROs.
Removes potential classification of elementary and secondary students under age 18 as delinquent for disturbing the peace if the conduct occurs in a school building, on school grounds or during a school-related event.
The Criminal Justice Reform Act of 2018 included several sections that affect schools, districts, and students. The Act:
Establishes a childhood trauma task force to identify school-aged children who have experienced trauma, and to make recommendations on treatment services.Requires certain criteria in the process for school resource officer (SRO) selection.
Establishes standards for the memorandum of understanding between a district and public safety entities for SROs.
Removes potential classification of elementary and secondary students under age 18 as delinquent for disturbing the peace if the conduct occurs in a school building, on school grounds or during a school-related event.
An Act protecting the rights of custodial and other non-teaching employees of school districts
Chapter 160 amends G.L. Chapter 71, Section 59B to require promotion and discipline of non-teaching employees to be conducted in accordance with any collective bargaining agreement.
Effective: 08/03/18
Effective: 01/16/19
An Act relative to economic development in the commonwealth
The 2018 Economic Development bill
includes:
a $75M appropriation for a competitive grant to be administered by the Executive Office of Education for the purchase and installation of equipment and facilities upgrades to expand career technical education.
The creation of the Massachusetts Cybersecurity Innovation Fund that can be accessed to promote the development and implementation of educational programs in Massachusetts public schools.
a $75M appropriation for a competitive grant to be administered by the Executive Office of Education for the purchase and installation of equipment and facilities upgrades to expand career technical education.
The creation of the Massachusetts Cybersecurity Innovation Fund that can be accessed to promote the development and implementation of educational programs in Massachusetts public schools.
An Act relative to students with dyslexia
Chapter 272 requires that the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education, in consultation with the Department and Early Education and Care, issue guidelines to assist districts in developing screening procedures or protocols for students who demonstrate one or more potential indicators of a neurological learning disability. The requirement is subject to appropriation.
An Act relative to the financial condition of the pioneer valley regional school district
Effective: 11/08/18
Chapter 295 allows the Pioneer Valley Regional School District (PVSD) to borrow up to $2 million with approval by the school committee and the elementary and secondary education commissioner to mitigate budget deficits.
The bill also requires the PVSD to contract a fiscal overseer and gives the commissioner authority to approve the appointment, allows the commissioner and DOR to recommend the establishment of a finance control board for the district, and defines parameters for fiscal actions of the PVSD throughout the borrowing period.
An Act to promote and enhance civic engagement
Effective: 02/06/19
On November 8, 2018, Governor Baker signed into lawChapter 296 of the Acts of 2018, An Act to promote and enhance civic engagement.
The law is the culmination of extensive efforts by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (Board) and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (Department) to ensure that Massachusetts students receive meaningful instruction and opportunities for engagement in civics education.
The Board’s Working Group on Civic Learning and Engagement, led by then Vice-Chair David Roach, presented their report to the Board on June 23, 2015. One of the recommendations was to “initiate the process to revise the 2003 History and Social Science Curriculum Framework and, in doing so, consider developments in the field that, if thoughtfully integrated into our existing frameworks, could enhance the effectiveness of civics instruction.” The Board and Department have carried out this charge, resulting in the revised History and Social Science curriculum framework that the Board approved in June 2018. The 2018 framework increases emphasis on civics at all grade levels, including a new grade 8 course on civics. These fundamental aspects are reflected in Chapter 296 of the Acts of 2018.
Chapter 296 codifies many of the recommendations originally made by the Board and expands access to resources for the implementation of the new History and Social Science curriculum framework through the establishment of the Civics Project Trust Fund. The new law, effective February 6, 2019, includes the following provisions:
The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education, shall establish a non-partisan high school voter challenge.
Each school district shall include in its three-year improvement plan a description of its implementation of the new civics education requirements.
All public school students shall receive instruction in US history and social science, including civics.
The Department shall provide professional development opportunities for educators on the history and social science framework.
The Department shall develop tools aligned with the framework to support districts in implementing it, subject to sufficient resources in the Civics Project Trust Fund, for the 2020-2021 school year.
Each public school serving students in the eighth grade and each public high school shall provide not less than 1 student-led, non-partisan civics project for each student, consistent with the History and Social Science curriculum framework.
The Department shall establish a Commonwealth Civics Challenge with guidelines for districts that will be implemented in the 2022-2023 school year, subject to appropriation.
The Commissioner is to administer the Civics Project Trust Fund established in Section 1 of Chapter 296 to assist with the development, implementation, professional development, stakeholder engagement, and assessment of the History and Social Science framework. The Commissioner is also responsible for approval and oversight of the private donations made to the Fund to assure that no donation is accompanied by any condition of use.
One additional component of Chapter 296 pertains to a History and Social Science assessment. Section 7 states that any assessment the Board adopts not later than the 2021-2022 academic year that aligns with the History and Social Science framework and includes a “participatory component” will satisfy the requirement that districts provide a student-led civics project to students.
On November 8, 2018, Governor Baker signed into lawChapter 296 of the Acts of 2018, An Act to promote and enhance civic engagement.
The law is the culmination of extensive efforts by the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education (Board) and the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (Department) to ensure that Massachusetts students receive meaningful instruction and opportunities for engagement in civics education.
The Board’s Working Group on Civic Learning and Engagement, led by then Vice-Chair David Roach, presented their report to the Board on June 23, 2015. One of the recommendations was to “initiate the process to revise the 2003 History and Social Science Curriculum Framework and, in doing so, consider developments in the field that, if thoughtfully integrated into our existing frameworks, could enhance the effectiveness of civics instruction.” The Board and Department have carried out this charge, resulting in the revised History and Social Science curriculum framework that the Board approved in June 2018. The 2018 framework increases emphasis on civics at all grade levels, including a new grade 8 course on civics. These fundamental aspects are reflected in Chapter 296 of the Acts of 2018.
Chapter 296 codifies many of the recommendations originally made by the Board and expands access to resources for the implementation of the new History and Social Science curriculum framework through the establishment of the Civics Project Trust Fund. The new law, effective February 6, 2019, includes the following provisions:
The Secretary of State, in consultation with the Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education, shall establish a non-partisan high school voter challenge.
Each school district shall include in its three-year improvement plan a description of its implementation of the new civics education requirements.
All public school students shall receive instruction in US history and social science, including civics.
The Department shall provide professional development opportunities for educators on the history and social science framework.
The Department shall develop tools aligned with the framework to support districts in implementing it, subject to sufficient resources in the Civics Project Trust Fund, for the 2020-2021 school year.
Each public school serving students in the eighth grade and each public high school shall provide not less than 1 student-led, non-partisan civics project for each student, consistent with the History and Social Science curriculum framework.
The Department shall establish a Commonwealth Civics Challenge with guidelines for districts that will be implemented in the 2022-2023 school year, subject to appropriation.
The Commissioner is to administer the Civics Project Trust Fund established in Section 1 of Chapter 296 to assist with the development, implementation, professional development, stakeholder engagement, and assessment of the History and Social Science framework. The Commissioner is also responsible for approval and oversight of the private donations made to the Fund to assure that no donation is accompanied by any condition of use.
One additional component of Chapter 296 pertains to a History and Social Science assessment. Section 7 states that any assessment the Board adopts not later than the 2021-2022 academic year that aligns with the History and Social Science framework and includes a “participatory component” will satisfy the requirement that districts provide a student-led civics project to students.
An Act relative to education collaboratives
Chapter 437 makes technical corrections to the collaborative law, as well as requiring the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (Department) to create no more than six regional districts for collaboratives and allowing collaboratives to have access to grants in an effort to promote the use of educational collaboratives as providers of educational programs and services for districts.
An Act relative to financial literacy in schools
Chapter 438 establishes criteria for financial literacy standards should the Board choose to direct the Department to develop a separate curriculum framework. It also directs the Department to make resources available to districts to assist them in choosing materials and curriculum relative to personal financial literacy.
Effective: April 2, 2019
An Act relative to regional schools
Chapter 440 allows a regional school committee to designate any single member for the purpose of signing payroll warrants and accounts payable warrants with the requirement that that member share such records with the school committee at its next meeting.
Approved: 07/17/17
FY2018 BUDGET LAWS
FY2018 General Appropriations Act
The General Appropriations Act (GAA) includes total state spending of $39.4 billion, representing a $652 million (1.7 percent), increase over FY2017 spending. This spending recommendation is based on a projected 3.4 percent increase in tax revenue for FY2018.
The Department’s appropriations total $5.324 billion, which represents an increase of $113.5 million (2.2 percent), over FY2017 spending. The General Appropriations Act affirms a commitment to fund education aid for our districts but reduces spending to a number of ESE accounts due to the lowered revenue forecast for FY2018. In signing the budget, the Governor vetoed spending of $5.6 million in our accounts, most of which represented legislative earmarks for specific local projects. These vetoes were subsequently overridden by the Legislature.
I. Education Local Aid & Reimbursements
Chapter 70 aid (7061-0008) is increased by $118.9M (2.6 percent) over FY2017. The increase is designed to allow for a minimum aid increase of $30 per pupil over FY2017 for every school district and provides $25 million to begin addressing the increased costs of employee and retiree health care.
GAA funding for the Special Education Circuit Breaker account (7061-0012) is increased by $4 million over FY2017. Regional School Transportation (7035-0006) has a $500,000 increase. The METCO grant program (7010-0012), and Charter School Tuition Reimbursements to Districts (7061-9010) are level funded. We estimate the latter will cover 100 percent reimbursement for the capital facility component of charter tuition ($893 per student) and 69.3 percent of first-year tuition increases.
GAA funding for the Special Education Circuit Breaker account (7061-0012) is increased by $4 million over FY2017. Regional School Transportation (7035-0006) has a $500,000 increase. The METCO grant program (7010-0012), and Charter School Tuition Reimbursements to Districts (7061-9010) are level funded. We estimate the latter will cover 100 percent reimbursement for the capital facility component of charter tuition ($893 per student) and 69.3 percent of first-year tuition increases.
Non-Resident Vocational Student Transportation (7035-0007) and Transportation Reimbursement for Homeless Students (7035-0008) were reduced by $7,500 and $250,500, respectively, from FY2017 levels.
Student Assessment
The General Appropriations Act funding for the Student Assessment account (7061-9400) was insufficient to meet our planned program spending for the upcoming school year. The Governor made a reserve draw to bring the account total to $31.1 million.
III. Departmental Grant & Targeted Support Programs
The majority of our grant and targeted support programs were either level funded or reduced.
The majority of our grant and targeted support programs were either level funded or reduced.
The General Appropriations Act reduces Targeted Assistance (7061-9408) by $183,955 from FY2017.
Connecting Activities (7027-0019) received an increase of $555,250 for both earmarks and additional grant funding.
Adult Basic Education (7035-0002) received an increase of $829,289 for both earmarks and additional grant funding.
The Expanded Learning Time Grant Program (7061-9412) was reduced by $197,685 from FY2017.
The After-School Grant Program (7061-9611) is funded at $3.5 million for both earmarks and additional grants.
The Consolidated Literacy Program (7010-0033) is $76,907 higher than FY2017 spending, while Bay State Reading received an increase of $206,167.
The Special Education in Institutional Settings account (7028-0031) received an increase of $4 million over FY2017 level.
The Safe and Supportive Schools Grant program
(7061-9612) is funded at $500,000, a $101,400 increase over FY17.
The GAA transfers the WPI Schools of Excellence
(7061-9624) account from the Department of Higher Education to ESE, funded at
$1.4 million.
IV. ESE Administrative & Operational Resources
The General Appropriations Act reduces ESE’s administrative funding below our maintenance level for FY18. This reduced funding totals $756,764 in the following three accounts that fund agency staff.
7010-0005 Main Administration $256,096
7028-0031 Special Education in Institutional Settings $233,061
7061-9200 Education Data Services $267,607
Outside sections that are of significance to the Department and to elementary and secondary schools:
Section 90. Designates the Secretary of Education as Chair of the Homeless Student Transportation Commission established by Chapter 133 of the Acts of 2017.
Section 126. Directs the Executive Office of Education to conduct a feasibility study on substituting a minimum number of instructional hours for the minimum number of days as required by the board of education. As part of the study, the Executive Office of Education shall determine cost savings associated with an instructional hours based system including, but not limited to, energy costs, administrative costs, and transportation costs.
Section 127. Directs the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to conduct a feasibility study on rural school district aid.
FY2018 Supplemental Budget Approved: 02/16/18
Section 127. Directs the Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to conduct a feasibility study on rural school district aid.
FY2018 Supplemental Budget Approved: 02/16/18
Chapter 24 appropriated $15M for a reserve to provide extraordinary relief to school districts educating students who are residents of Puerto Rico or the United States Virgin Islands who have enrolled in their schools or in an educational entity to which they pay tuition to educate their students after October 2, 2017 due to the impact of Hurricanes Maria and Irma.
FY2018 Supplemental Budget
Approved: May 21, 2018
Approved: (in part) 07/26/18
FY2018 Supplemental Budget
Chapter
90 of the Acts of 2018
Approved: May 21, 2018
Chapter 90 appropriated $12.5M to line-item 7061-0012, the circuit breaker account, and $2.5M to line-item 7061-9010, the charter school tuition reimbursement to districts account.
FY2019 BUDGET LAWS
FY2019 General Appropriations Act
The FY2019 GAA provides total state spending of $41.834 billion. The law provides $5.585 billion in spending authority for the Department, most of which goes to cities, towns, and school districts through Chapter 70 and other forms of education aid and reimbursements. This total represents 13.3 percent of the total state budget and 4.1 percent growth over FY2018 spending, an increase of $124.4 million (2.3 percent) above the Governor’s FY2019 request (House 2).
The following summarizes the GAA education spending. More detail for all Department appropriations is available in our budget tracking spreadsheet, which the Board has received.
The following summarizes the GAA education spending. More detail for all Department appropriations is available in our budget tracking spreadsheet, which the Board has received.
V. Education Aid & Reimbursements
Chapter 70 aid (7061-0008) is increased by $160.6 million (3.4 percent) over FY2018, including $12.5 million to provide transitional relief to districts related to the change in the reporting metric from low-income to economically disadvantaged. The increase in Chapter 70 maintains the long-standing commitment to foundation level spending in all districts; fully phases in (100 percent) effort reduction for high-effort communities; and provides a minimum aid increase of $30 per pupil to all districts. The General Appropriations Act proposes making a structural change in the foundation budget by shifting the Limited English Proficient (LEP) rate to an LEP increment for each grade category. The law also addresses the rising cost of employee and retiree health insurance by including in foundation budgets 14.2 percent of the increase that the Foundation Budget Review Commission recommended in 2015; the House also recommended 14.2 percent and House 2 proposed 11 percent. Based on the GAA budget, districts are eligible to receive the higher of the amount determined by the GAA or the amount passed by the House; 43 districts receive the aid amount determined by the House. H.4800 also includes another $15 million in the Foundation Reserve “pothole” account (7061-0011) for districts serving Puerto Rican and USVI students displaced by Hurricanes Maria and Irma.
Funding for the Special Education Circuit Breaker account (7061-0012) is increased by $25.6 million over FY2018. Charter School Tuition District Reimbursements (7061-9010) is increased by $7 million over FY2018. Regional School Transportation (7035-0006) is increased by $7.4 million over FY2018. The METCO grant program (7010-0012) is increased by $1.5 million over FY2018. Non-Resident Vocational Student Transportation (7035-0007) is level funded. Homeless Student Transportation Reimbursement (7035-0008) receives a $1 million increase over FY2018.
The General Appropriations Act added two new accounts to provide $1.5 million in additional aid to Rural Schools (7061-9813), as well as $0.5 million for a Summer Learning Grant program (7061-9814).
VI. Literacy Accounts and English Language Acquisition
The General Appropriations Act partially supported the Governor’s proposal and combined Bay State Reading with Consolidated Literacy under the 7010-0033 account but added earmark language to fund Reading Recovery and Bay State Reading at FY2018 levels.
The English Language Acquisition Account (7027-1004) sees an increase of $1.64 M over FY2018, which will fund SEI training for vocational education educators, implement the provisions of the Language Opportunity for Our Kids (LOOK) Act, and provide support for middle and high school students deemed to be at risk of dropping out of school as a result of language barriers or challenges in English language acquisition.
VII. Expansion of Career Technical Education (7027-0019) The General Appropriations Act gives an increase of $1.45 M to School-to-Career Connecting Activities over FY2018, and the account contains $0.5 M of earmarks.
VIII. Program Changes
The General Appropriations Act increases the Adult Basic Education line item (7035-0002) by $3.7 million to reduce the waitlist of students for English language learning slots and to fund the new professional development system to provide training and support for ABE programs.
AP Math and Science Programs (7035-0035) received a $300,000 increase over FY2018.
The General Appropriations Act supports the Governor’s request to fund Student Assessment (7061-9400) at $32.1 million, which includes $1 M of new funding to support the implementation of the new history and social science standards and the development of new assessments in history and social science.
The General Appropriations Act funds Innovation Schools (7061-9011) at $35,000 above FY2018.
Assessment Consortium (7061-9401) is level funded. The Governor vetoed $0.2 M in funding the Conference Report had provided above FY2018.
7061-9408 Targeted Assistance has received an increase of $0.358 M above FY2018.
The General Appropriations Act funds Teacher Licensure (7061-9601) at $1,867,453, an increase of $121,104 to cover the additional volume expected in a license renewal year.
The General Appropriations Act transfers the administration of the Recovery High School Program (7061-9607) from the Department of Public Health to DESE and increases the funding to $3.1 M.
After adjusting for $1.7M of earmarks, the 7061-9611 After-School Grant Program is funded at $2,576,923, which is $0.22 M higher than FY2018 net spending excluding earmarks.
The Safe and Supportive Schools Grant Program (7061-9612) has been increased by $250,000 above FY2018 in the GAA.
The General Appropriations Act adds $650,000 to the YouthBuild Programs line item (7061-9626) over FY2018.
Mentoring Matching Grants (7061-9634) has received an increase of $275,000 above FY2018.
Child Sexual Abuse Prevention (7061-9812) is increased by $0.25 M of earmarks.
Child Sexual Abuse Prevention (7061-9812) is increased by $0.25 M of earmarks.
The General Appropriations Act has added a new line item for FY2019:
Educational Improvement Project Grants (7010-1192) at $1.625 M. This account represents a collection of legislative earmarks that fund specific local education needs.
Educational Improvement Project Grants (7010-1192) at $1.625 M. This account represents a collection of legislative earmarks that fund specific local education needs.
In the GAA, The Department’s other accounts are either level funded or receive minor increases/decreases due to payroll changes or with the removal/addition of legislative earmarks.
An Act making
appropriations for fiscal year 2018 to provide for supplementing certain
existing appropriations and for certain other activities and projects
Chapter
273 of the Acts of 2018
The October 2018 supplemental budget to the FY2018 GAA appropriated:
$5M additional dollars in the Department’s targeted assistance line-item (7061-9408)
$7.5M to the Executive Office of Education for infrastructure safety grants
$7.5M to the Department for grants to districts that allow for contracts with licensed community based mental and behavioral service providers
# # #
The October 2018 supplemental budget to the FY2018 GAA appropriated:
$5M additional dollars in the Department’s targeted assistance line-item (7061-9408)
$7.5M to the Executive Office of Education for infrastructure safety grants
$7.5M to the Department for grants to districts that allow for contracts with licensed community based mental and behavioral service providers
# # #
Wednesday, January 23, 2019
Another Charter School to Expand
With January's regular meeting, the Board begins closing out of this year's charter school season. Final votes remain to be taken, possibly at a special meeting on February 11 and, at the regular meeting on February 12.
Two votes taken yesterday, Tuesday, January 22, determine how a charter school may move forward in New Bedford (in accordance with Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 71, Section 89, and 603 CMR 1.00).
Alma del Mar Charter School in New Bedford requested an amendment to expand its enrollment from 594 to 1,044 seats. Commissioner Jeff Riley, Mayor Jon Mitchell, and Founder and Principal of Alma del Mar Charter School Will Gardner agreed on a proposal that would, instead and among other things, increase enrollment to 900 seats and transfer an unused school building from New Bedford Public Schools to Alma del Mar. Alma would be responsible for seeing the building (unused since 2015) is in good repair by its opening in August 2019. (The Department's announcement of the proposal is HERE; others have reported and/or responded, including HERE, HERE, and HERE).
The Motion was approved by the Board:
- Location: New Bedford
- Maximum enrollment: 900
- Grades served: K-8
- Effective school year: FY2020
- Yes: Craven, West, McKenna, Fernandez, Peyser, Sagan, Morton, Mathews, Moriarty
- No: Stewart
- Abstain: Doherty
- The school will participate in good-faith negotiations with New Bedford Public Schools that will result in a memorandum of understanding that supports effective implementation of the proposed collaboration and substantially aligns with the terms of the letter of intent agreed to by both parties and the Commissioner. The memorandum of understanding between Alma del Mar Charter School and New Bedford Public Schools is subject to Commissioner approval prior to execution.
- As soon as possible, the school shall submit a draft enrollment policy that reflects the negotiated integrated enrollment process with New Bedford Public Schools and the proposed growth plan to reach 900 students, for Commissioner approval.
- The school will promptly and effectively communicate with the Department regarding any and all significant matters relevant to the suitability and readiness of a second campus location for occupancy at the start of the 2019-2020 school year. These communications shall occur within a reasonable period of time but in any event no later than 96 hours after occurrence.
- If the Commissioner determines that these conditions have not been met or that necessary legislation has not been enacted this enrollment increase of 450 seats is null and void.
- Location: New Bedford
- Maximum enrollment: 1,044
- Grades served: K-8
- Effective school year: FY2020
- Yes: Craven, West, McKenna, Fernandez, Peyser, Sagan, Morton, Mathews, Moriarty
- No: Stewart, Doherty
- The Board grants this increase of 594 seats if the Commissioner determines that either good-faith negotiations on the memorandum of understanding between the school and New Bedford Public Schools have irretrievably broken down or the necessary legislation has not been enacted in sufficient time for planning and implementation of the model proposed in the letter of intent among the parties.
- The Commissioner shall report to the Board if he determines that this enrollment increase of 594 will take effect.
New Bedford Public Schools Superintendent, Thomas Anderson, and Alma Del Mar's Charter Operator, Executive Director, and Founder, Will Gardner were seated together at yesterday's Board meeting. They commented enthusiastically on the proposed arrangement and also took some questions.
Negotiations are not typical in the charter school process. School Committee and teachers were not part of the new proposal, either. Parents have not had a chance to respond to details of the new proposal in the week since it was announced. The community as a whole has not had an opportunity to contribute to the process as newly proposed and -- based on my questions to the couple seated at the table -- were not likely to. There could be school-based conversations, though.
Had this new proposal had the benefit of a substantive process in New Bedford, and with key stakeholders weighing-in (School Committee members, parents in the neighborhood and across the city, etc.), it might have had my support.
We all have a stake in the solid education of all our people, least of which are countless situations where our personal interests depend on others' competence, empathy, and compassion. I continue to hold that no new charter schools should be approved or expanded until all of our schools are fully funded as recommended by the Foundation Budget Review Commission.
Photo credit: New heating system, pipes/instruments, part of the renovation completed at Bowman Elementary School, Lexington in 2013.
Thursday, January 17, 2019
School and District Report Cards
A preamble to the post!
Which feels more parent-friendly?
School and District Report Cards have been *required* since No Child Left Behind, but access to the information in them has been inconsistent, hard to find, and, for most of us (that is, those who do not speak "DESE"), hard to understand.
This:
In accordance with the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), all states and districts receiving federal Title I funds must prepare and disseminate annual report cards. Report cards are critical tools for promoting accountability for schools, districts, and states by publicizing data about student performance and program effectiveness for parents, policymakers, and other stakeholders. Report cards help parents/guardians and the general public see where schools and districts are succeeding and where there is still work to do. [Intro to the 2016 Massachusetts State Report Card]
Or this:
Families and communities are critical partners to a school’s success. Just as a student’s report card shows how they are performing, the school report card shows how a school is performing in multiple areas. It shows the school’s strengths and the challenges that need to be addressed to ensure the school is meeting the needs of all students. [Draft Intro on 2018 Massachusetts Report Card Prototype]
Second one. By a mile. I didn't copy down what was read to us the other night, but think it may have been edited further so that it is shorter now, too.
In accordance with the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), all states and districts receiving federal Title I funds must prepare and disseminate annual report cards. Report cards are critical tools for promoting accountability for schools, districts, and states by publicizing data about student performance and program effectiveness for parents, policymakers, and other stakeholders. Report cards help parents/guardians and the general public see where schools and districts are succeeding and where there is still work to do. [Intro to the 2016 Massachusetts State Report Card]
Or this:
Families and communities are critical partners to a school’s success. Just as a student’s report card shows how they are performing, the school report card shows how a school is performing in multiple areas. It shows the school’s strengths and the challenges that need to be addressed to ensure the school is meeting the needs of all students. [Draft Intro on 2018 Massachusetts Report Card Prototype]
Second one. By a mile. I didn't copy down what was read to us the other night, but think it may have been edited further so that it is shorter now, too.
School and District Report Cards have been *required* since No Child Left Behind, but access to the information in them has been inconsistent, hard to find, and, for most of us (that is, those who do not speak "DESE"), hard to understand.
Public reporting efforts have been geared toward compliance with state and federal laws, rather than being intentionally designed to meet people's needs. As a consequence, most of the data have been unseen and unused, thus limiting their ability to promote and support improvement for students and systems.
With the reauthorization of ESEA (from No Child Left Behind) to Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA), states are once again mandating school and district reporting. This time, states are determined to communicate better -- and differently -- with parents and other stakeholders (see notes at end of this post).
States are required to annually report on "education indicators" at the state, district, and school levels, including data used in accountability systems (which are still very much under construction in MA), assessment, educator qualifications, and other measures of school quality. Report cards could answer questions and inform actions, such as:
- How are our schools doing (compared to others in the state, nationally)?
- What are the bright spots?
- Where are the gaps?
Since 2007, Massachusetts has prepared school and district report cards that contain all federally required elements, and has made them available via the Department's School and District Profiles website. (The site is in transition. This is the "general information" page for the state's profile; it mirrors the format of school and district report cards. Soon there will be a dedicated page for School and District Report Cards).
Beginning with the 2018-2019 report card, states must also include the per-pupil expenditures for the preceding year of federal, state, and local funds, including actual personnel and non-personnel, disaggregated by source of funds, for the state as a whole and for each public school district and public school in the state. (Oh hey! While we're at it, might we also want to see Net School Spending there? Hmmm?)
This past Monday's special meeting was an opportunity for the Board to hear an update about and see a demo of a new school and district report card that the Department will publish later this month.
In an effort to develop "parent-friendly" report cards, we learned that, wisely, the Department partnered with Learning Heroes beginning in Fall 2017. Present with Russell Johnston, Senior Associate Commissioner, and Rob Curtin, Associate Commissioner, were Bibb Hubbard, Founder and President, and Erica Gray, Strategic Advisor, from Learning Heroes.
Learning Heroes was founded 4 years ago as a resource for parents. They have conducted impressive research in 25 states for the purpose of improving communication to parents via school and district report cards. In so doing, they have partnered with more than 25 national organizations, among them National Parent Teacher Association (PTA), Flamboyan Foundation, National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE), Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), and Common Sense Media.
To understand what parents/guardians/families want to know and see in these reports, their partnerships enabled Learning Heroes to engage:
Since we are talking about sharing data better with everyone, we should also have a clear understanding of how student data is being used and protected. And, because data doesn't always speak for itself, families deserve training and support to understand what they can do to help their children once they have this information.
Done well, parents/guardians/families and all stakeholders could inspire action in local communities and provide a conduit for shared successes with the public-at-large. With so many working from the same set of information, they could also form a baseline for authentic conversations with stakeholders. If we do, our communities, our schools, and, most importantly, our students will benefit.
- - -
Header image credit: Screenshot, http://profiles.doe.mass.edu
NOTES:
Beginning with the 2018-2019 report card, states must also include the per-pupil expenditures for the preceding year of federal, state, and local funds, including actual personnel and non-personnel, disaggregated by source of funds, for the state as a whole and for each public school district and public school in the state. (Oh hey! While we're at it, might we also want to see Net School Spending there? Hmmm?)
This past Monday's special meeting was an opportunity for the Board to hear an update about and see a demo of a new school and district report card that the Department will publish later this month.
Learning Heroes was founded 4 years ago as a resource for parents. They have conducted impressive research in 25 states for the purpose of improving communication to parents via school and district report cards. In so doing, they have partnered with more than 25 national organizations, among them National Parent Teacher Association (PTA), Flamboyan Foundation, National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE), Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO), and Common Sense Media.
To understand what parents/guardians/families want to know and see in these reports, their partnerships enabled Learning Heroes to engage:
- 100+ focus groups
- In Depth Interviews (IDIs)
- 10 national surveys
- Dozens of ethnography sessions
- Dozens of tests of their tools
- Focus on low-income parents/guardians and parents/guardians of color
The Massachusetts prototype was further built on information Learning Heroes gleaned from focus groups with Massachusetts parent groups, including Massachusetts PTA, Massachusetts Parents United, and Phenomenal Moms.
I was struck by the opportunity these report cards present for the state to put information into the hands of parents and families and other stakeholders. We have an opportunity to tell better stories, as a result. By sharing this data, we can go behind the numbers and statistics because that's where the stories are. Stories about our schools, students, and teachers, and the experiences they are having. It's an opportunity to (dare I say it!) decide how we want to feel about our schools as we tell stories that highlight and celebrate success and even identify areas for improvement.
National research revealed:
- Parents have high expectations of public schools
- They can have an over-inflated view of their child's progress, believing their child as at or above grade level in reading and math
Disaggregated data, presented flatly in text and table form, has had unintended consequences. Many times it has been perceived as discriminatory or inadvertently shaming of students who are falling short because families ultimately view the data through a personal lens. Families of color whose children are not in special education, for example, may have wondered why they were seeing data on children of color in special education. The same holds true on homelessness, English learners, foster care, and military. A clear summative rating is very important because it lets one know how a school is performing as a whole for all children.
Research of Massachusetts parents showed:
- They are more likely to see their child at grade level
- Parents are more likely to question their child's achievement when presented with data
- When parents are shown that their child is not at or above grade level, they want to know what they can do to help their child improve or to get more involved
Parents primarily care about their own child and it makes sense that the data would focus on how their action will directly impact their child's progress. Context and information about why the policy or practice matters personally to the school and their child are key and should be included.
Parents are problem-solvers. By sharing information, schools and communities can match students with additional supports they need, including, high-quality afterschool and summer programs, college mentors, summer job programs. Doing so helps students thrive.
Different people need different data to meet their information needs, including school committee members, superintendents, principals, and teachers. As someone who sat on a school committee, I see them benefiting from clearly communicated data about their schools and districts. Having access to the same information creates opportunities for telling dynamic stories.
Different people need different data to meet their information needs, including school committee members, superintendents, principals, and teachers. As someone who sat on a school committee, I see them benefiting from clearly communicated data about their schools and districts. Having access to the same information creates opportunities for telling dynamic stories.
DESE walked us through a demo of the new site. It was uncluttered, with lots of white space, good visual information, and noticeably fewer blocks of text and data tables. There were clear directions to "click" for more information or detail about the data.
As the Parent Representative on the Board, not an education expert or corporate CEO, what I saw I understood to be something of a game-changer. Rarely have report cards of this type treated parents as the customer. It remains to be seen just how personal the information will be or how clear the context will be for doable action steps. It strikes me that, up to now, too few families and other stakeholders have been unable to find the information they were looking for.
Too many times, school information comes at parents and families in a language we don't understand. I mean this both literally and figuratively. I'll admit that understanding "Edu-speak" has been a kind of badge of honor for me, but it is truly a barrier. It matters that MA's new report cards will be written in everyday language and offered in English, plus nine others.As the Parent Representative on the Board, not an education expert or corporate CEO, what I saw I understood to be something of a game-changer. Rarely have report cards of this type treated parents as the customer. It remains to be seen just how personal the information will be or how clear the context will be for doable action steps. It strikes me that, up to now, too few families and other stakeholders have been unable to find the information they were looking for.
Since we are talking about sharing data better with everyone, we should also have a clear understanding of how student data is being used and protected. And, because data doesn't always speak for itself, families deserve training and support to understand what they can do to help their children once they have this information.
Done well, parents/guardians/families and all stakeholders could inspire action in local communities and provide a conduit for shared successes with the public-at-large. With so many working from the same set of information, they could also form a baseline for authentic conversations with stakeholders. If we do, our communities, our schools, and, most importantly, our students will benefit.
- - -
Header image credit: Screenshot, http://profiles.doe.mass.edu
NOTES:
- For perspective, take a look at West Virginia's approach
- Or Tennessee's
- Nashville's Parent Data Chats
- Louisiana created a one-pager to promote their report card to schools, families, pediatricians, realtors, and other stakeholders
- National School Boards Association (NSBA) and Data Quality Campaign (DQC) partnered to create this one-pager
- CCSSO just released this resource: Communicating Performance | A Best Practice Resource for Encouraging Use of State and School Report Cards
- Also just published, check out this article from National Association of Secondary School Principals: Parental Engagement | More Important than Ever?
Wednesday, September 5, 2018
September marks the beginning of my fifth year on the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education. I recommit myself to fighting for education equity for all children in the Commonwealth's public schools, so that each child is prepared for their future.
From: Intern, Press (GOV)
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 10:42 AM
Subject: GOVERNOR PATRICK APPOINTS THREE EDUCATION LEADERS TO BOARD OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2014 10:42 AM
Subject: GOVERNOR PATRICK APPOINTS THREE EDUCATION LEADERS TO BOARD OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
GOVERNOR PATRICK APPOINTS THREE EDUCATION LEADERS TO BOARD OF ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION
BOSTON – Tuesday, August 5, 2014 -- Governor Deval Patrick today announced that he has appointed three education leaders -- Margaret McKenna, Katherine Craven, and Mary Ann Stewart -- to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education. McKenna has been named the new chairperson of the Board.
“I am very pleased to appoint three experienced education professionals to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education,” said Governor Patrick. “I know they will continue to be great partners in our efforts to close the achievement gap and ensure that all of our students are prepared for future success.”
“These appointments bring decades of professional and educational experience to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, ensuring a strong Board for our students,” said Secretary of Education Matthew Malone. “We have made great progress in closing the achievement gap, but I know these members will join the Board in their commitment to keep working towards this critical goal.”
Margaret McKenna served as President of Lesley University for 22 years, where, during her tenure, the University grew from 2,000 to more than 10,000 students and established itself as a national leader in teacher education. Following her leadership of Lesley, she went on to serve as President of the Walmart Foundation for four years, leading one of the nation’s biggest philanthropic foundations, supporting hunger relief, sustainability, women’s economic empowerment, and career opportunities. McKenna began her career as a civil rights attorney for the U.S. Department of Justice and later served as Deputy White House Counsel to President Jimmy Carter. She helped establish the United States Department of Education in the late 1970s, where she served as Deputy Undersecretary. In 1981, McKenna became Vice President of Radcliffe College, where she served until 1985 when she left to take over the helm of Lesley. She serves as President Emeritus and Professor of Leadership at Lesley. McKenna has been appointed to numerous boards, including the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce, and has been the recipient of a number of awards and honors. She has been a Fellow at the Institute of Politics at Harvard University’s Kennedy School and at the Aspen Institute’s Ascend Project. McKenna received her Bachelor of Arts at Emmanuel College and her Juris Doctorate at Southern Methodist University School of Law. Currently, McKenna serves as acting director and visiting professor of the Sillerman Center for the Advancement of Philanthropy at the Heller School of Brandeis University. McKenna also serves on the Boston School Committee, a post from which she will step down prior to being sworn in as chair of the state Board. McKenna is a resident of Boston, and has two adult sons. Her appointment fills the vacancy left by Board chair Maura Banta, whose term expired in June 2014.
“Margaret McKenna is a proven and effective leader, with deep experience at the national, state, and local levels,” said Paul Guzzi, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Greater Boston Chamber of Commerce. “Her considerable expertise in education and civil rights will be a tremendous benefit to the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education and its critical role of strengthening our schools and fostering the future talent of our region.”
“Given that this is such a critical time for the Commonwealth in its efforts to further improve the education system, I am excited that the Governor has tapped such a qualified leader for the Board,” said Jackie Jenkins-Scott, President of Wheelock College. “To envision the future, we need innovative, bold leaders who are strategic, collaborative thinkers like Margaret McKenna, who has the expertise, depth of knowledge and track record for leading change where needed.”
Katherine Craven currently serves as the Chief Administrative Officer of Babson College, one of the nation’s leading business colleges. Katherine began her career as a budget director and policy advisor to the Massachusetts House of Representatives Committee on Ways and Means. Craven was named Executive Director and Chief Executive Officer of the newly created Massachusetts School Building Authority in 2004, where she won plaudits for her effective management and leadership. While leading the School Building Authority, Craven was also named First Deputy Treasurer of the Commonwealth. Craven left the School Building Authority and the Treasurer’s Office in 2011 when she was appointed Executive Director of the UMass Building Authority and Assistant Vice President for Capital Finance for the University of Massachusetts. Craven received a Bachelor of Arts in History from Harvard University. She is a resident of Brookline, where she lives with her husband and four children. Her appointment fills the vacancy left by Board member Beverly Holmes, who stepped down from the Board last year. Craven will fill the business seat on the Board.
“Public service is a huge part of who Katherine Craven is - it is what drives her,’’ said University of Massachusetts President Robert L. Caret. “With her boundless energy, sharp intellect and creativity, I am convinced that her service on the Board of Elementary and Secondary Education will be as valuable as was her service at the UMass Building Authority.”
Mary Ann Stewart served as President of the Massachusetts PTA from 2010-2012. She has served on the PTA State Board since 2005. Since 2009, Stewart has served as an elected member of the Lexington School Committee, leading the Board as chair from 2011-2012. Stewart received her Bachelor of Science from the University of Massachusetts for Music Education. Stewart currently serves as Director of Education and Programs for Children, Youth, and Families for the Parish of the Good Shepherd in Newton. Stewart is a resident of Lexington, Massachusetts, where she lives with her husband and three children. Her appointment fills the PTA vacancy left by Board member Ruth Kaplan, whose term expired in June 2014.
“I am confident that Mary Ann Stewart will be an outstanding member of the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education,” said Lexington Public Schools Superintendent Paul Ash. “She has served as a member of the Lexington School Committee with great distinction. Her thoughtful decisions are always made in the best interest of all students and educators.”
Monday, January 8, 2018
Charter School Redux
We're nearing the end of "charter school season" and await the recommendations of the Acting Commissioner to see if any are advanced to the Board for approval later this month.
Some criticize charter schools for not educating all children, those with special needs or who are English language learners, in particular. Others say that charters and core public schools shouldn't be compared because the rules are different. Still others say the problem is with how charters are funded.
But if you go back to the original law (and it's been amended several times since enacted) one thing is clear: Where core public schools have always been about taking in and educating all children, charter schools never were -- and that was supposed to provide their edge.
"Labs of innovation" meant that they were not going to take everyone on purpose. Instead, they would take a small number of students so that they could try something new and different from what was offered in the home public school -- and then -- share back with them the findings of their innovations for student success. But few charter schools have lived up to this notion.
It’s reasonable that families want a personalized education for their child, but the answer isn’t charter schools, because that’s not what they’re about. Ultimately, it’s competition for funding that charters offer, and this turns the whole thing into a resource problem because charters drain money and resources from schools and districts, thus increasing class sizes, resulting in fewer educators necessary to address student needs in the home core district. Considered another way, such a condition contributes to the very problem everyone says they are trying to solve - that of closing gaps. It's an unhealthy cycle.
We should be so judicious, so scrupulous in our authorization, that we opt only for proposals with truly innovative and proven models not offered in the home districts. Why are we taking proposals for expansion or for new charter school authorization, when the state is falling down on its commitment to reimburse districts? Or when numbers of districts report time and again the impact that expansion has had, or authorization will have, on strapped budgets and an out of date state funding formula?
We all have a stake in the solid education of all our people, least of which are countless situations where our personal interests depend on others' competence, empathy, and compassion. Charter schools have become a powerful wedge for privatizing a public good and Massachusetts voters said that was the wrong way to go when they voted 2:1 to oppose charter expansion (Ballot Question 2). Nevertheless, unimpeded expansion of charter schools continues to represent a threat to adequate funding of core public schools.
Some criticize charter schools for not educating all children, those with special needs or who are English language learners, in particular. Others say that charters and core public schools shouldn't be compared because the rules are different. Still others say the problem is with how charters are funded.
But if you go back to the original law (and it's been amended several times since enacted) one thing is clear: Where core public schools have always been about taking in and educating all children, charter schools never were -- and that was supposed to provide their edge.
"Labs of innovation" meant that they were not going to take everyone on purpose. Instead, they would take a small number of students so that they could try something new and different from what was offered in the home public school -- and then -- share back with them the findings of their innovations for student success. But few charter schools have lived up to this notion.
It’s reasonable that families want a personalized education for their child, but the answer isn’t charter schools, because that’s not what they’re about. Ultimately, it’s competition for funding that charters offer, and this turns the whole thing into a resource problem because charters drain money and resources from schools and districts, thus increasing class sizes, resulting in fewer educators necessary to address student needs in the home core district. Considered another way, such a condition contributes to the very problem everyone says they are trying to solve - that of closing gaps. It's an unhealthy cycle.
We should be so judicious, so scrupulous in our authorization, that we opt only for proposals with truly innovative and proven models not offered in the home districts. Why are we taking proposals for expansion or for new charter school authorization, when the state is falling down on its commitment to reimburse districts? Or when numbers of districts report time and again the impact that expansion has had, or authorization will have, on strapped budgets and an out of date state funding formula?
We all have a stake in the solid education of all our people, least of which are countless situations where our personal interests depend on others' competence, empathy, and compassion. Charter schools have become a powerful wedge for privatizing a public good and Massachusetts voters said that was the wrong way to go when they voted 2:1 to oppose charter expansion (Ballot Question 2). Nevertheless, unimpeded expansion of charter schools continues to represent a threat to adequate funding of core public schools.
Wednesday, January 3, 2018
Economy in the Commonwealth
Reports on public transportation (specifically, the breakdown of public transit), appear in local and regional news on a regular basis. Most people see economic growth as the number one reason to invest in our transportation system. A comprehensive public transit system for all communities would include improvements to our existing transit infrastructure, as well as expanding smart, transit-oriented development that's affordable.
Transportation infrastructure isn't just about economic growth, it also overlaps with our affordable housing, education, climate change, and energy goals and we should seek to adopt the holistic model of "complete streets" when considering what those community goals should be.
Employers argue that a strong economy doesn't exist without a strong workforce and see investment in vocational technical education as a key to keeping the Commonwealth competitive.
We need an energy infrastructure that reduces pollution, promotes clean energy, reduces greenhouse gasses, and protects our natural climate and environment.
Transportation infrastructure isn't just about economic growth, it also overlaps with our affordable housing, education, climate change, and energy goals and we should seek to adopt the holistic model of "complete streets" when considering what those community goals should be.
Employers argue that a strong economy doesn't exist without a strong workforce and see investment in vocational technical education as a key to keeping the Commonwealth competitive.
We need sustainable and holistic practices for healthy natural and built environments that provide ample open space and reduced pollution, improving our communities and nurturing all of our residents.
We should all be concerned about the mounting crisis in privatization and corporatization of, not only our public transit system, but of our public education system, as well.
For many years already we have all seen a crisis in healthcare (and every developed nation -- and poor countries -- are working toward national healthcare, so why aren't we?) Solving it is part of the solution to the Commonwealth's economic problems, in addition to better healthcare for all.
We want flexible jobs? An innovative economy? Address income inequality? We are squandering those opportunities if we don't address transportation, affordable housing, public education, and healthcare now.
We have choices and the decisions that need to be made need to be made together. If it's important, let's make a plan and fund it. In my experience, when people get together, the best ideas come forward, so let's keep these issues front and center in this and the governor's race and see who has the vision and is willing to work with us to achieve it.
We should all be concerned about the mounting crisis in privatization and corporatization of, not only our public transit system, but of our public education system, as well.
For many years already we have all seen a crisis in healthcare (and every developed nation -- and poor countries -- are working toward national healthcare, so why aren't we?) Solving it is part of the solution to the Commonwealth's economic problems, in addition to better healthcare for all.
We want flexible jobs? An innovative economy? Address income inequality? We are squandering those opportunities if we don't address transportation, affordable housing, public education, and healthcare now.
We have choices and the decisions that need to be made need to be made together. If it's important, let's make a plan and fund it. In my experience, when people get together, the best ideas come forward, so let's keep these issues front and center in this and the governor's race and see who has the vision and is willing to work with us to achieve it.
Saturday, December 30, 2017
The State's FY18 Budget
We're less than halfway through the Fiscal Year (FY18), and, as I was re-reading MassBudget's FY18 budget analysis, I thought it worth noting a few of their key points.
Early Education: Quality early education and care helps prepare our young children for success in K-12 education and allows them to thrive more generally. Early education and care is also a critical work support for parents with young children, by offering safe and reliable care for kids while parents provide for their families. Funding for early education is -22% since 2001.
K-12 Education: Providing an excellent education to all children in Massachusetts supports future generations in the Commonwealth while contributing to our economy over the long term. Chapter 70 education aid is the main program for delivering state support to local districts across Massachusetts, and ensuring that schools have sufficient resources to provide the necessary services to all students.* The current (FY18) budget increased Chapter 70 Aid by $118.9 million (2.6%) to $4.75 billion.^ The FY18 Chapter 70 budget also includes a modest step to implement recommendations made by the Foundation Budget Review Commission (FBRC) in 2015.** The FBRC noted that current underfunding reduces the capacity of schools across the state to provide services to help all children succeed.
Higher Education: Higher education helps the people of our state contribute to their communities and gain the skills to succeed in a knowledge-driven economy. Our public higher education institutions – including the University of Massachusetts (UMass), the state universities, and our community colleges – educate a majority of Massachusetts high school graduates who go on to college. Graduates from public higher education are also more likely to stay in-state after graduation, contributing to our economy over the long term. Higher education funding is -15% since 2001, which has contributed to a doubling of tuition and fees between 2001-2016.
Environment & Recreation: The state budget funds programs that keep our air, water, and land clean, maintain fish and wildlife habitats, and staff and maintain our parks, beaches, pools, and other recreational facilities. The current FY18 budget provides $200.0 million for environment and recreation programs, which is $6.8 million more than in FY 2017. The Governor vetoed $4.8 million from the Legislature’s budget, largely by eliminating funding for specific environment and recreation projects located throughout the state. The Legislature overrode all of these vetoes. Even with this slight increase in funding in FY18, the environment and recreation budget is 35% below FY01 after adjusting for inflation.
Libraries: The state budget supports local libraries; the Boston Public Library, which serves as the primary research and reference service for the Commonwealth; and other library programs in Massachusetts. The current FY18 budget provides $25.5 million for libraries, which is slightly above the FY17 budget. The Governor vetoed $250,000 in funding for libraries, which the Legislature overrode. Even with a slight increase over FY17, funding for public libraries has fallen by 48 percent since FY 2001 after adjusting for inflation.
Unrestricted Local Aid: General local aid helps cities and towns fund vital local services such as police and fire protection, parks, and public works.^^ The current FY18 budget allots $1.06 billion for Unrestricted General Government Local Aid. Also known as UGGA or “general local aid,” the amount is an increase of $39.9 million over FY17 levels. The Commonwealth’s capacity to fund general local aid has been hindered by a series of significant state-level tax cuts during the 1990s and 2000s combined with the Great Recession. While over the past several years, general local aid funding has increased in step with or slightly above inflation, it still remains 40.5 percent below FY 2001 levels, when adjusted for inflation.
Tax Revenue: The budget adopted several “tax modernization” changes that would deliver a mix of both one-time and ongoing revenue. The Legislature did not adopt a number of proposals for additional revenues: higher taxes on flavored cigars, tighter eligibility and salary caps for Film Tax Credits, and extending the room occupancy tax to short-term rentals such as those made through Airbnb. Nor did the Legislature include an earlier proposal for a Tax Expenditure Review Commission to systematically review and make recommendations about many of the tax breaks provided by the Commonwealth. The budget expands the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) by making it easier for married victims of domestic abuse to claim the credit without filing a joint return with their spouses. Along with this change, the budget limits the size of state EITC benefits for part-time residents and eliminates access to the credit for nonresidents. The Legislature also agreed to create a new business tax credit for employers that hire qualified, Massachusetts-based veterans.
- - -* For further background on the state’s education funding system, see MassBudget's Demystifying the Chapter 70 Formula.
^ This increase is close to the 2.5% ($113.0 million total) increase from FY16 to FY17.
** Wherein the Commission found that according to the state’s estimate of what it takes to educate children (called the “foundation budget”), school districts are significantly under-resourced.
^^ For more information on general local aid, please see MassBudget's Demystifying General Local Aid in Massachusetts.
Wednesday, December 20, 2017
Announcement
As a longtime activist and Lexington resident, I announce my candidacy for state representative for the 15th Middlesex District.*
We’ve been boldly represented by Jay Kaufman for more than a generation and I heartily thank him for his service. Jay has been an effective leader who has tirelessly stood up for our values. His impact will be felt for many years to come.
The causes Jay supported -- and the issues we face in our district and beyond -- still need a courageous leader who isn't afraid to speak up and make change. I will champion:
- Fair and adequate education funding for each child
- Responsible energy policy that protects and sustains our environment and natural resources
- Improved healthcare for all
- Social justice and equal opportunity for economically disadvantaged, incarcerated, and vulnerable populations regardless of race, gender, religious identity, place of origin, or sexual orientation
I’ve been called upon to play a leadership role in key areas. Beginning in 2007, I worked on the Revenue Working Group with Progressive Democrats of Massachusetts. After holding office in local, state, and national PTA associations, and on the Lexington School Committee, Governor Deval Patrick appointed me as the parent representative on the state Board of Education. The Raise Up Massachusetts coalition asked me to serve as one of the lead signers of its Fair Share Amendment initiative, which establishes a new “millionaires’ tax” to provide needed funding for education and transportation.
Serving as a state representative will allow me to further extend my leadership on issues of critical importance to our families and our future. I am energized and ready to accept this challenge. With the help of voters in the 15th Middlesex, I can succeed.
For information and updates about the campaign, please visit/like the new facebook page.
* Lexington and Wards 1&7 in Woburn
Monday, October 2, 2017
Yes - let's build the Arts
While the Globe's editorial focused, primarily, on the arts as an economic driver (Let's build Massachusetts by building the arts), the arts are a component of a basic education. However, since the dawn of the "standards-based era", their focus of study has eroded in many schools; it doesn't help that the Massachusetts Arts Curriculum Framework hasn't been updated since first implemented in 1999.
An arts education can help students develop a variety of skills, such as critical thinking and problem-solving, as well as to help foster creative thinking. Further, the arts provide a way for students to communicate and collaborate across language, cultural, and other boundaries, and can increase their global knowledge. We should support efforts that:
*Massachusetts PTA's legislative position statements.
- - -
Follow on twitter:
@MA_Senate
@MassBudget
@MassPTA
#CreatetheVote
#MAlegis
An arts education can help students develop a variety of skills, such as critical thinking and problem-solving, as well as to help foster creative thinking. Further, the arts provide a way for students to communicate and collaborate across language, cultural, and other boundaries, and can increase their global knowledge. We should support efforts that:
- support, expand, and improve children's access to quality arts and cultural programs;
- support, expand, and improve arts literacy for all students;
- support, expand, and improve opportunities to use arts education to expand and enhance access to the core curriculum;
- support, expand, and improve activities that prepare teachers to integrate the arts into the curriculum of other academic subjects to supplement and engage student learning; and
- support, expand, and improve science, technology, engineering, arts, and mathematics (STEAM) initiatives.*
*Massachusetts PTA's legislative position statements.
- - -
Follow on twitter:
@MA_Senate
@MassBudget
@MassPTA
#CreatetheVote
#MAlegis
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





