Thursday, April 27, 2017

Better representation. It's time.

Senator Ken Donnelly was good and kind. His heart and skill as a legislator were matched by his passion and dedication as a public servant on behalf of the People of the 4th Middlesex and beyond. His legacy lives forever in our hearts and in the lives he changed. His genuine interactions with people inspired me in my own public service, and to find an office and run for it.

A Special Election has been called to fill this important seat. I enthusiastically announce my candidacy because I want to provide the best representation to the people of the communities across this district.

Today, people want to be more engaged. But they often don’t understand how the system should work for them. It can be difficult to navigate a complicated established structure to even reach the level where conversations can begin.

We need people in state government who have come up from the ranks, who know what it means to truly represent constituents – at the level of your elementary school or town meeting, where you are accountable to your neighbors. This is where change can happen, and I’ve been there and I’ve listened to people, and heard and understood the needs and hopes of families – from the high achievers to those who struggle to get attention for students with special needs. And then I led my schools through the worst financial crisis many of us have seen.

Politics at the national level have become uncertain. Better representation is essential and it’s urgent. Now is the time for changing the system to work for all of us, the way government should, with a hands-on, open-minded approach. That’s why I’m in this race.

As I’ve been gathering signatures in the five communities across the district, people have shared their personal, moving stories: Charlotte talked of her love and devotion for the diverse community she has embraced. Susan wants me to know that there are gaps in community employment for her adult son with special needs, even after transition planning. Pete is still feeling the pain of the recession.

Their concerns are mine, too. I look forward to a campaign that focuses on the critical issues we face in the district and across the Commonwealth: the need for revenue; for paid family and medical leave for modern families and workers; addressing climate change and securing a clean energy future; protecting access to reproductive rights, mental health, and health care, while making it more affordable; sustaining and strengthening our schools and communities; improving our transportation infrastructure; protecting the most vulnerable among us; and more.

Over the course of my career in public service, I have sought and served in progressively higher leadership positions that allowed me to represent parents and members of my community in ever wider circles.

I was first elected to my children’s elementary school site council and later served as local PTA co-president, then as president of the Massachusetts PTA. I’ve served my town of Lexington in Town Meeting, then was elected twice to the School Committee, including a term as chairwoman.

Currently as the Parent Representative on the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and Secondary Education, I continue to advocate on behalf of parents across the Commonwealth for the funding and policies that will ensure our public schools’ continued and improving quality, and so that they serve the diverse needs of all families.

I have led the battle for adequate financing for transportation and public schools as an original signer of the Fair Share Amendment petition, which is moving toward final passage.

Additionally, I worked as Director of Education and Programs for children, youth, and families at a small church in Newton for ten years and currently teach at Middlesex Community College.

My values are clearly represented throughout my work, and I will continue to stand up for those values in the Senate in my drive to improve people’s lives. I’m approaching this campaign with a sense of optimism, purpose, and direction. I look forward to continued opportunities to hear from you.

The Special Primary Election will be on Tuesday, June 27 for the 4th Middlesex District (Arlington, Billerica, Burlington, Woburn, and Lexington, precincts 1,2,4,5,6 and 7).

It would be an honor to serve as this District’s State Senator and I ask for your consideration.

Wednesday, April 5, 2017

ATM Continues: Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Back in Battin Hall for the sixth night of 2017 Annual Town Meeting.
Articles, Reports, and Presentations to Date
Live-blogging to begin once we're in session.

7:30 PM
Madam Moderator has called the Meeting to Order.
Updating as we go.
Brief recess for Town Manager announcements
Pat Goddard, Director of Public Facilities to retire this summer - this is his last Town Meeting. Town Manager and Superintendent taking a moment to celebrate and thank Pat for his 10 years of service. Many School and Town staff here.
Standing ovation from Town Meeting for Pat.

Meeting back in order
Motion to take up Articles 37 + 12
VOICE VOTE - MOTION is ADOPTED

Article 37 - Amend General Bylaws - TreesTo see if the Town will vote to amend the Tree Bylaw to provide incentives to preserve large trees and to replant large shade tree species, or act in any other manner in relation theretoi. (Inserted by the Board of Selectmen at the request of the Tree Committee)
  • Description: Because of the time invested iin its growth, a large tree is proportionally more valuable than many small trees. Also, large shade tree species in general provide greater environmental benefits than small ornamental tree species. This article seeks to amend the Tree Bylaw to encourage the preservation of existing large trees in setback areas during major construction, and to encourage the planting of large shade tree species for mitigation of removed trees.
Board of Selectmen (BoS): Unanimously in support
Planning Board (PB): Unanimously in support
Conservation Commission (CC): Unanimously in support
NO mic: Big trees do too much damage to property. They should be taken down.
Q: What happens with trees around the house, branches in danger of doing damage?
Trees: Certified Arborist, if there is really a hazard, there is no penalty.
Requires simple majority
YES - 150
NO - 5
Abstain - 2
APPROVED

Article 12 - Municipal Capital Projects and EquipmentTo see if the Town will vote to appropriate a sum of money for the following capital projects and equipment:


    a) Center Streetscape Improvements and Easements - that this item be indefinitely postponed;
    b) Automatic Meter Reading System;
    c) Equipment Replacement;
    d) Street Improvements and Easements;
    e) Storm Drainage Improvements and NPDES Compliance;
    f) Hydrant Replacement Program;
    g) Comprehensive Watershed Stormwater Management Study and Implementation;
    h) Sidewalk Improvements, Additions, Design and Easements;
    i) Dam Repair;
    j) Townwide Culvert Replacement;
    k) Townwide Signalization Improvements
    l) Hartwell Avenue Ingrastructure Improvements - Supplemental Funds;
    m) Bikeway Bridge Renovations;
    n) Hartwell Avenue Compost Site Iprovements;
    o) Westview Cemetery Building Design;
    p) Westview Cemetery Irrigation;
    q) Highway Sign Machine;
    r) Townwide Phone Systems-Phase VI;
    s) Municipal Technology Improvemet Program;
    t) Network Redundancy & Improvement Plan
    u) Bedford Street at Eldred Street Safety Improvements;
    v) Transportation Mitigation [ADOPTED by TM, 3/27]
    w) Hill Street Sidewalk Design; and
    x) Ambulance Replacement
    and authorize the Selectmen to take by eminent domain, purchase, or otherwise acquire any fee, easement or other interests in land necessary therefor; determine whether the money shall be provided by the tax levy, by transfer from available funds, including enterprise funds, by borrowing, or by any combination of these methods; determine if the Town will authorize the Selectmen to apply for, accept, expend and borrow in anticipation of State aid for such capital improvements; or act in any other manner in relation thereto. (Inserted by the Board of Selectmen)

    MOTION is MOVED by Selectman Pato
    We're hearing about each part; taking Qs. If any TMM wants to vote no, Town Moderator will separate out that part for the Meeting to vote separately on it.
    Capital Expenditures Committee (CEC) supports Part B by vote of 4-1.
    We're at Part H, taking Qs.
    Now we're at Part L, with a revision: "Hartwell Avenue Infrastructure Improvements - Supplemental Funds That the Town make a supplemental appropriation of $2,185,000 for the designing, permitting and constructing improvements to Hartwell Avenue, including replacing or rehabilitating the Hartwell Avenue bridge crossing at Kiln Brook and upgrading the Maguire Road intersection, and to take by eminent domain, purchase or otherwise acquire any fee, easement of other interest in land necessary therefor; and that to meet this appropriation the Town authorize an increase by said amount in the appropriation made under Article 11-h of the 2015 Annual Town Meeting so that the total appropriation authorized by such Town Meeting actions for these purposes by $6,935,000, and further, that the Treasurer, with the approval of the BOS, is authorized to borrow said increase of $2,185,000 under MGL Ch.44, sec.7, or any other enabling authority. Any premium received by the Town upon the sale of any bonds or notes approved by this vote, less any such premium applied to the payment of the costs of issuance of such bonds or notes, may be applied to the payment of costs approved by this bote in accordance with Ch.44, sec.20 of the MGL, thereby reducing the amount authorized to be borrowed to pay such costs by a like amount;"
    YES mic: Chamber of Commerce Board supports 10-L
    YES mic: PB supports 10-L
    CORRECTION to the immediate above: Supporting 12-L
    Taking Qs on 12-m
    Editorial: Oh man - understanding that the traffic on the bikeway bridge over Grant Street will be diverted, as will Grant Street traffic, during maintenance of 12-m bikeway bridge.
    Moving on to 12-n; taking Qs
    YES mic: Rises to applaud the Engineering Dept for their comprehensive and cost-effective approach to 12-n during our capital-straining environment.
    Now we're on 12-o
    Taking Qs on 12-o
    So far, no TMM has asked for any part to be taken up separately
    Request to separate the vote for 12-o
    NO mic: Doesn't want a "posh" space with increased fees for burial
    Q about the purpose for the structure
    Answer is that it is a space for grieving people
    NO mic: Capital projects and capital constraints - what's the line? Doesn't think this project rises to a critical level of need
    Project will be entirely funded through cost of sale of graves, not taxpayer dollars
    YES mic: The state of the current facility is inadequate, urges support
    YES mic: The cost of the project will be entirely covered outside of the tax levy
    Still talking about 12-o, to be taken separately
    NO mic: Capital costs will be covered, but I'm still seeing a $339,000 shortfall. Capital plan has had the Visitor Center since 2011 and this one has only been on it for three years. Doesn't think this is a priority. In reality we are not covered all costs.
    YES mic: For the safety and health of the people who work in that facility, we need to support this project.
    NO mic: TMM Calls the Question
    BOS on 12-o: unanimous in its support
    CEC: unanimous support
    AC: unanimous support
    Voting only on 12-o, which requires a 2/3 majority
    YES - 113
    NO - 38
    Abstain - 7
    12-o is APPROVED
    Now, 12-q
    AC: on 12-q was 6-2-1 --- new information and a New Vote is 7-1-1
    CEC: 3-2 on 12-q
    Moving quickly through 12-r, s
    Qs on 12-s
    Qs on 12-b
    Qs on 12-q
    Request to separate 12-q, but not ready for that yet
    Taking Qs on previous parts of Art.12
    YES mic: PB supports 12-u
    YES mic: PB supports 12-w
    BOS is in unanimous support of 12-w
    YES mic: TMM has been contacted by constituents in support of this sidewalk design (12-w); urges support
    Request for 12-b to be taken separately
    That's 12-b, 12-q to be taken separately
    YES mic: People in this neighborhood asked for a sidewalk four years ago. People walk to public transportation and they need a sidewalk. Also, kids can't walk to or from Diamond middle school without a sidewalk.
    YES mic: I've been waiting 30 years for this one, don't let it get away. Support this one
    We have reached the final part, 12-x. No comments.
    CEC: Supports all parts as presented
    AC: Supports all parts as presented
    BOS: Unanimous on all items
    Voting only on 12-b, which requires a simple majority
    YES - 141
    NO - 9
    Abstain - 4
    12-b is APPROVED
    Voting only on 12-q, which requires a simple majority
    YES - 139
    NO - 11
    Abstain - 5
    12-q is APPROVED
    Voting on remaining parts of Article 12 (not b,o,q,v)
    YES - 154
    NO - 0
    Abstain - 1
    Remaining parts of Article 12 is APPROVED
    Announcement that Al Gentile's last day is this Friday (Lexington Minuteman Newspaper)
    We are adjourned until 7:30 PM Wednesday, April 12, 2017 
    (No Meeting Monday, April 10, 2017 - first night of Passover)
    10:15 PM

    Monday, April 3, 2017

    2017 Annual Town Meeting Continues Tonight, Monday, April 3

    We're in Battin Hall in the Cary Memorial Building
    1605 Massachusetts Avenue, Lexington
    Articles, Reports, and Presentations to Date
    Live-blogging to commence once we are in session.

    7:30 PM

    Madam Moderator has gavelled us in and we're in session.
    Updating as we go.
    Tribute to Senator Ken Donnelly of Arlington, who passed away yesterday due to complications from brain cancer. Moment of silence.
    Checking electronic voting devices.

    Article 19 - Getting to Net Zero To see if the Town will vote to raise and appropriate a sum of money necessary to hire consultants to provide advice and analysis to the Getting to Net Zero Task Force and Town staff, determine whether the money shall be provided by the tax levy, by transfer from available funds or by any combination of these methods, or to act in any other manner in relation thereto. (Inserted by the Board of Selectmen at the request of the Sustainable Lexington Committee)


    • Funds Requested: $40,000 
    • Description: The Getting to Net Zero Task Force is exploring the possibility of reducing our buildings' emissions to net zero over the next 25 to 35 years. Lexington's buildings are currently responsible for 66% of Lexington's greenhouse gas emissions. The task force is composed of a broad range of stakeholders including local buisinesses, commercial and residential property owners, subject matter experts, Town staff, and appropriate Town committee members. The task force, with the assistance of consultants, will develop strategies, plans and recommendations to achieve an annual balance of zero greenhouse gas emissions from building operations for approval by the Town.
    Selectman Pato moves the MOTION
    Asks to recognize Mark Sandeen of Sustainable Lexington

    Board of Selectmen (BOS): Unanimous

    Appropriation Committee (AC): 7-2
    Citizen mic: Asks TM to take the next step by continuing to fund the Getting to Net Zero Task Force; if we are not part of the solution, we are part of the problem
    YES mic: TMM urges colleagues to support
    Q: Wants to know the progress, if any, on renewables
    Mark Sandeen: We just got notified that we are approved
    Q: Wants concrete examples of how this Task Force will implement change
    Sandeen: Running "Lexington Energy Challenge" - based on info that will implement specific programs for each type of building (historic, residential, commercial, etc). Currently building to "LEED Silver". Will impact new Hastings Elementary School, Fire Sation, Police. Looking to "green" our electrical supply. These all play together.
    Q: Money for replacing windows in Monroe - how can this help with that?
    Sandeen: I would suggest that this is a historic building, perhaps wait for the CPA Article to come up.
    Requires simple majority
    YES -148
    NO - 4
    Abstain - 3
    MOTION CARRIES

    Article 18 - Visitors Center (Citizen Article) To see if the Town will vote to raise and appropriate a sum of money for planning, constructing, originally equipping and furnishing a new Visitors Center, or for planning, remodeling, reconstructing and making extraordinary repairs to the existing Visitors Center, and for the payment of all other costs incidental and related thereto; determine whether the money shall be provided by the tax levy, by transfer from avialable funds, by borrowing, or by any combination of these methods; or act in any other manner in relation thereof. (Inserted by Dawn McKenna and 9 or more registered voters)

    • Funds Requested: $100,000
    • Description: The Visitors Center was built over 50 years ago for the Battle of Lexington Bicentennial visitors. It is the information gateway for tourists, residents, newcomers, and corporations considering locating in Lexington. Last year, 120,000 people entered the building, making it one of the most heavily used buildings in Lexington; they spent $190,000 in the shop underwriting the cost of operations. Lexington collects $1.4 million in annual hotel and meals taxes. The building has become outdated and is not fully accessible. When originally built, it was staffed by the Chamber of Commerce. Today the Town occupies, manages, and staffs the Visitors Center. it has become the hub of the Liberty Ride. Many who use the Minuteman Commuter Bikeway benefit from the facility as well. As we approach the 250th Anniversary of the Battle of Lexington, and implement the Battle Green Masterplan, this article would fund the design and construction of a 21st century Visitors Center providing new economic growth opportunities.
    Dawn McKenna for the MOTION
    Asks to recognize Jon Himmel, Tourism Committee (also on Permanent Building Committee)
    Jon Himmel: Money for Design Process, specifically Schematic Design and Design Development, followed by Value Engineering, BOS review. Project is not eligible for CPA funding.
    Asks to recognize Fred Johnson, Tourism Committee
    Johnson: Lexington has Untapped Potential. 4th most visited community in Massachusetts. Lexington Hotels have had visitors from over 40 countries. Tourism creates jobs - 744 in Lexington. Need a 21st c Visitor Center.
    Asks to recognize Dawn McKenna
    McKenna: Building is inadequate in many ways. Unwelcoming. To piggy back on the previous presentation, it's an energy hog. Not fully accessible. Urges support.
    BOS: 3-2
    AC: 9-0
    CEC: In favor of the project at funding level for schematic design; Jill Hai Chair, asks to AMEND the appropriation to $21,000 instead of $100,000 (by a CEC vote of 4-1)
    • MOTION to AMEND:
      • McKenna - Opposed to this MOTION
      • BOS: 3-2 in Support
        • Selectman Kelly speaks in Opposition to the AMENDMENT
      • AC: 0-9 in Opposition
        • Citizen mic: Lexington Historical Society wants to see the project completed, which is what we voted to do
        • Q: Do the members of BOS support and oppose in the same ways?
        • Barry: No - different people.
        • Q: Timing of this project a concern?
        • McKenna: Want to be ready to come forward at STM this fall and not wait until next year's ATM.
        • NO mic: We have waited a long time to do anything to the VIsitors Center
        • YES mic: CEC is in favor of updating the Visitors Center, but TM doesn't know what the total cost will be, which is why we want the project to come back to TM to evaluate the dollar scope, not go to the BOS for a decision
        • Citizen mic: Jim Shaw, Vice Chair of Chamber of Commerce, we support the original MOTION and vote no on this AMENDMENT
        • NO mic: I have seen so many projects come before TM and get approved. This structure is needed
        • YES mic: Support this AMENDMENT, stick to the process.
        • Q: for CEC - policy to require all docs be approved at the same itme?
        • CEC: No. our practice has been to approve in three phases, but is not policy
        • NO mic: We have an obligation to provide good facilities. Time is of the essence
        • Q: If it passes, will BOS be in support of the AMENDED MOTION
        • BOS: It would be 4-1
      • YES - 82
      • NO - 69
      • Abstain - 3
      • AMENDMENT CARRIES
    AMENDED MAIN MOTION open for discussion
    Q: Applaud the passion and persistence of Tourism Committee. What is the thinking on "pre-fabricated solutions"? and What about swing space?
    McKenna: On pre-fabs - those decisions would come during the schematic phase. Swing space - three steps forward, two steps back; need to clarify. We don't know.AC: 8-0 in support of the new MOTION (one is absent)
    YES mic: Jerry Michelson for Center Business - in support
    Q: Is Economic Dev Director
    Melissa Tintocollis: Have been learning a lot about the visitor-based economy. I understand Tourism is to have a vital center we need foot traffic and visitor spending. Tourism does that.
    MOVES the QUESTION
    by VOICE VOTE: the Ayes have it to close debate and take the vote
    YES - 150
    NO - 6
    Abstain - 2
    MOTION CARRIES


    Article 2 - Community Preservation Committee - to receive the report of the CPC and place on file.
    VOTE taken by VOICE VOTE: the MOTION passes and the report is placed on file.

    Marilyn Fenollosa, Chair of CPC, speaks to the report

    Article 10 - Community Preservation 2018 Operating Budget and CPA Projects (except 10-h) To see if the Town will vote to act on the report of the Community Preservation Committee on the FY2018 Community Preservation budget and, pursuant to the recommendations of the Community Preservation Committee, to appropriate from the Community Preservation Fund, or to reserve amounts in the Community Preservation Fund for future appropriations; for the debt servcice on previously authorized financing; for adiminstrative expenses of the Community Preservation Committee for FY2018; for the acquisition, creation, and preservation and, if acquired with Community Preservation Act Funds the rehabilitation or restoration of open space; for the acquisition, creation, preservation, and rehabilitation and restoration of recreational land; for the acquisition, preservation, rehabilitation and restoration of historic resources; and through the acquisition, creation, preservation and support and, if acquired with Community Preservation Act funds, the restoration or rehabilitation of community housing; including, in all cases, rehabilitation or restoration that constitutes capital improvements or extrordinary repairs to make assets functional for their intended use; and to determine whether the money shall be provided by the tax levy, or from estimated CPA surcharges and the estimated State match and supplement for the upcoming fiscal year, by available funds in the CP Fund, from transfer from other available funds, by borrowing, or by any combination of these methods or act in any other manner in relation thereto. (Inserted by the Board of Selectmen at the request of the Community Preservation Committee)

    • Funds Requested:
      • a) Interpretive Signage Project - $38,400
      • b) Parker's Revenge Interpretive and Public Education Signage & Displays - $41,350
      • c) Greeley Village Rear Door and Porch Supplemental Request - $56,712
      • d) Affordable Units Preservation - Pine Grove Village/Judges Road - $1,048,000
      • e) Willard's Woods and Wright Farm Meadow Preservation - $40,480
      • f) Cotton Farm Conservation Area Improvements - $301,300
      • g) Wright Farm Supplemental Funds - $37,900
      • h) Stone Building Feasibility Study - $25,000 (to be taken up at ATM on Wednesday, April 5)
      • i) Munroe School Window Restoration - $620,000
      • j) Center Streetscape Improvements - (recommend IP)
      • k) Community Center Sidewalk - $220,000 (recommend IP)
      • l) Park Improvements - Athletic Fields - $125,000
      • m) Town Pool Renovation - $1,620,000 COSTS are TBD - pulling out until ATM on Wednesday, April 12
      • n) Park and Playground Improvements - $60,000
      • o) CPA Debt Service - $2,404,259
      • p) Administrative Budget - $150,000
    • Description: This Article requests that Community Preservation funds and other funds, as necessary, be appropriated for the projects recommended b y the Community Preservation Committee, the debt service on previously authorized projects, and for administrative costs.
      • Parts to pull:
        • 10-h wed 4/5
        • 10-m wed 4/12
        • 10-j,k IP
      • BOS: Unanimous on all aspects
      • AC: Unanimous in Support
      • CEC: Unanimous in Support
        • YES - 145
        • NO - 0 
        • Abstain - 3
      • MOTION CARRIES to put in the above buckets
    • 10-c Greeley Village Rear Door and Porch Supplemental Request - $56,712 (presentation and discussion for all parts follow)
      • requires simple majority
      • YES - 149
      • NO - 0
      • Abstain - 2
      • Approved
    • 10-a Interpretive Signage Project - $38,400
      • requires simple majority
      • YES - 154
      • NO - 0
      • Abstain - 3 
      • Approved
    • 10-b Parker's Revenge Interpretive and Public Education Signage & Displays - $41,350
      • requires simple majority
      • YES - 119
      • NO - 26
      • Abstain - 5
      • Approved
    • 10-d Affordable Units Preservation - Pine Grove Village/Judges Road - $1,048,000
      • Planning Board (PB): Supports this part, and all parts, of Article 10
      • requires 2/3 majority
      • YES - 146
      • NO - 1
      • Abstain - 3
      • Approved
    • 10-e Willard's Woods and Wright Farm Meadow Preservation - $40,480
      • requires simple majority
      • YES - 137
      • NO - 1
      • Abstain - 3
      • Approved
    • 10-f Cotton Farm Conservation Area Improvements - $301,300
      • requires simple majority
      • YES - 109
      • NO - 23
      • Abstain - 9 
      • Approved
    • MOTION to take up 10-g tonight
    • VOICE VOTE - TM does not approve
    • TM will take up remaining parts of Article 10 this Wednesday
    MOTION to ADJOURN until Wednesday, April 5
    We are adjourned
    10:35 PM

    And that's a wrap!
    - - -

    Wednesday, March 29, 2017

    2017 Annual Town Meeting, 7:15 PM

    About to get underway. Live blogging, updating as we go.

    Town Moderator calls Town Meeting to order; into immediate recess for Diversity Award Presentation.


    7:15 PM LPS Diversity Award Presentation

    Superintendent Mary Czajkowski announces Tammy Darling, a social studies teacher at LHS as this year's award recipient. Among other things and good work, Tammy revived the "Race and Gender" course this year.
    We will remain in recess for a few minutes.
    Tonight's Town Meeting (TM) Agenda was prepared by the Town Moderator, in consultation with staff, boards and committees, article sponsors.
    This post is not an official record of the Annual Town Meeting proceedings; it is offered as information to interested persons by a member of Town Meeting.
    And we're back in session.
    Testing our electronic voting devices.

    Article 2 - Capital Expenditures Committee Report: Receive the report of the CEC.
    Unanimous - the report is received and placed on file.
    Jill Hai, CEC Chair, speaks to the report's highlights.

    Article 20 - Harbell Street AcceptanceTo see if the Town will vote to establish as a Town way and accept the layout of as a Town way Harbell Street from Paul Revere Road a distance of 645 feel, more or less, to the end of Harbell Street, as laid out by the Selectmen and to take by eminent domain, purchase or otherwise acquire any fee, easement, or other interest in land necessary therefor; and raise and appropriate money for the construction of said street and for land acquisition; determine whether the money shall be provided in the tax levy, by transfer from available funds, by borrowing, or by any combination of these methods; or act in any other manner in relation thereto. (Inserted by the Board of Selectmen)
    • Funds requested: $147,000
    • Description: This article has been requested by residents of Harbell Street to have the street brought up to Town standards and accepted by the Town. The total cost of bringing the street up to Town standards will be borne by the residents through the assessment of betterments.
    Requires 2/3 vote
    Selectmen are unanimous
    Appropriation Committee is unanimously in support
    CEC approves with a vote 4-1
    Yes-139
    No - 2
    Abstain - 3
    MOTION CARRIES 

    Article 17 - Hastings School Replacement DesignTo see if the Town will vote to appropriate, borrow or transfer from available funds, any amount of money, to be expended under the direction of the Permanent Building Committee [PBC], for the costs for the Design Development phase of the detailed design relating to the Marie Hastings Elementary School located at 7 Crosby Road, in Lexington, which school facility shall have an anticipated useful life as an educational facility for the instruction of school children of at least 50 years and for which the Town may be eligible for a school construction grant from the Massachusetts School Building Authotrity (MSBA). The MSBA's grant program is a non-entitlement, discretionary program based on need, as determined by the MSBA, and any costs the Town incurs in connection with the Design Development phase in excess of any grant approved by and received from the MSBA shall be the sole responsibility of the Town; or act in any other manner in relation thereto. (Inserted by the Board of Selectmen at the request of the School Committee).
    • Funds Requested: $720,000
    • Description: This funding will allow the design work for the Hastings School project to continue through the design development phase. While the appropriation is for $720,000, a partial reimbursement from the MSBA will bring the Town's costs closer to $540,000. It is anticipated that financing for the completion of design work and construction will be requested at a Fall 2017 Special Town Meeting (STM).
    Director of Public Facilities, Pat Goddard makes a presentation.
    School Committee Member, Jessie Steigerwald presents the report of the School Committee. The report is accepted and placed on file.
    Selectmen: Unanimously in support
    Appropriation Committee (AC): 9-0 in support
    CEC: 5-0 in support
    Question: Many sustainability features, can we revisit solar?
    Goddard: It will be solar ready, infrastructure, the Town will get a better contract if we wait for the solar panels after the building is complete.
    Question: What is the process?
    Godard: Anticipate we will occupy in February 2020; will put out an RFP in spring of 2020
    Q: What is to become of the "old" school after complete
    Goddard: the site is constrained, We will demolish the building.
    Q: I applaud building a new school. Have heard over $100M in debt and haven't addressed a "7th elementary school".
    Goddard: The appropriation two years ago, we looked at multiple options for building school capacity and why we need a replacement for Hastings.
    Q: What options, as to materials, do we have?
    Goddard: The Permanent Building Committee is responsible for this and there is ongoing process as to what those choices are and will ultimately be chosen.
    Q: Are there risks with this investment?
    Goddard: MSBA has agreed to share in the cost of the study. If they don't approve the project scope, or the Town doesn't approve the scope
    Lamb: Also risk of the Override Exclusion not passing.
    Requires 2/3 vote
    Yes - 155
    No - 0
    MOTION CARRIES
    Abstain - 1

    Article 15 - School Capital Projects and EquipmentTo see if the Town will vote to appropriate a sum of money to purchase additional equipment, furniture and systems for the schools, and to maintain and upgrade the schools'technology systems; determine whether the money shall be provided by the tax levy, by transfer from available funds, by borrowing, or by any combination of these methods; or act in any other maner in relation thereto. (Inserted by the School Committee)
    Ian Daley presents need for new capital is primarily for MCAS 2.0
    Selectmen: Unanimous
    AC: Unanimous
    CEC: Unanimous
    Q: Ipads for middle school students - what's the life expectancy?
    Daley: 5-6 years
    Q: a bit of a concern, obsolete in a few years. Have we looked into renting?
    Daley: We do evaluate that. Focus on Chromebooks, 3 yr life expectancy.
    Q: How to chromebooks stand up?
    Daley: we are confident they fulfill the needs of schools. We willcontinue to evaluate
    Comment: We should continue to look into leasing equipment
    Q: "Unfunded Mandate" WRT MCAS testing...what kind to money is the State requiring from us to put the test online.
    Daley: $142,000 at the elementary level
    Q: Unfunded mandates for testing - for all communities?
    Daley: We are not unique
    Q: Per unit cost for interactive whiteboards?
    Daley: I don't have an exact unit cost in fron of me, they are throughout the district; use of tech being integrated in curriculum
    Q about Ipads vs. chromebooks, something about the touch vs keyboards
    Daley: We're constantly evaluating what works best for students
    Q: Does the school dept currently have a furniture plan across all schools?
    Daley: We're in the midst of that process for a 5-yr plan.
    Requires 2/3 vote
    Yes - 153
    No - 0
    Abstain - 2
    MOTION CARRIES

    Article 16 - Public Facilities Capital ProjectsTo see if the Town will vote to appropriate a sum of money for capital improvements, renovations, including new construction to public facilities for:
    • School Building Envelopes and Systems Program;
    • - Lexington High School Air Conditioning – Teacher Planning Offices and Library;
    • Municipal Building Envelopes and Systems;
    • Public Facilities Mechanical/Electrical System Replacements;
    • - LHS Security Evaluation and Upgrade;
    • - LHS Guidance Space Mining;
    • - LHS Nurse Office and Treatment Space; and
    Votes to be taken separately:
    • Public Facilities Bid Documents
    • Parking Lot for Community Center
    and determine whether the money shall be provided by the tax levy, by transfer from available funds, including enterprise funds, by borrowing, or by any combination of these methods; to determine if the Town will authorize the Selectmen to apply for, accept, expend and borrow in anticipation of State aid for such capital improvements; or act in any other manner in relation thereto. (Inserted by the Board of Selectmen)
    Selectmen Kelly presents the Article.
    Pat Goddard presents the four LHS items.
    Report of Selectmen is received and placed on file.
    School Committee (SC): Unanimously Support for the relevant parts
    CEC: Unanimous for the relevant parts
    AC: Unanimous for the relevant parts
    Q about a vision for a new high school (understand all of these band-aids)
    Superintendent Czajkowski: We have a new principal coming and will work together on a vision for a new High School, but we need space for students to be treated by Guidance, Nurse, now.
    Requires 2/3
    Yes - 158
    No - 0
    Abstain - 1
    MOTION CARRIES

    Votes taken separately:

    • Public Facilities Bid Documents
    Selectmen: Unanimously Supports
    CEC: Unanimously Supports
    AC: Supports 6-1-1
    Community Center Program Advisory Committee: Unanimously Supports
    Requires 2/3 Majority
    Q: If the Gym were done alone, how much of the $6M would that make up?
    Pat Goddard (PG): Not a lot of cost; when we get into the next phase we can detail that
    Q: What's the distance between the two buildings?
    PG: About 250 feet. Also looking to make a vehicle connection.
    Q: The expectation is that there will be a walkway. Currently proposing substantial parking. Will there be direct access to the Pelham property?
    PG: That's part of the plan; we will evaluate further in the next phase.
    Q: There are access issues for pedestrians crossing Marrett Road - - does the scope include an eval of the entire site? Pelham, Marrett, both for vehicles and pedestrians?
    PG: We will be doing a traffic study.
    YES mic: Support for families to do activities together.
    Q: right now we have gyms in all of the schools, not being used after school hours. Why aren't they used?
    PG: They are universally booked every evening weeknights November-June. Estabrook gym is utilized by the Recreational Dept.
    YES mic: Standing here in support for additional funding is needed for our clear understanding of costs.
    Now someone is standing at the NO mic.
    NO mic: If Pelham enrollment continues to rise, we will need more space. Plus, a new Fire Station, and a new Hastings School - overrides and increasing taxes make this a hard case to support at this time.
    YES mic: We're talking about somethng that we need, not nice to have. Gym and kitchen are on the must have list.
    Q: Vintage of this building and the wisdom of investing in this building (references PCBs); what is the pinch point in abatement costs to make it acceptable?
    PG: The estimate incudes abatement for abestos and PCBs; EPA has updated their regulations to include caulk and masonry, which is less invasive now.
    YES mic: Voting YES, was on the ad hoc committee that recommended to the Selectmen. Remind that this is an $117,000 appropriation to study and get more information.
    Q: Kitchen being converted to professional kitchen? Could it be rented out as a function hall space, private & individuals?
    PG: Yes, we're looking to updgrade to a professional
    YES mic: I don't find this an easy vote, there are good arguments on both sides. I rise now because I hope we approve the funding and hope we will think through the next steps for funding and that approving this funding now does not commit anyone with questions to approve ultimate funding of the project.
    MOTION to CALL the Question
    Passes by voice vote
    Simple majority vote
    Yes - 126
    No - 18
    Abstain - 14
    MOTION CARRIES
    Continuing with Votes taken separately
    • Parking Lot for Community Center
    Town Manager, Carl Valente presents expansion of 20 spaces at Community Center. Trying to accomplish 4 things with this deal: 1). to take ownership of the parking spaces; 2). very close to having an agreement with the Scottish Rite for a sidewalk; 3). agreed to putting up a sign identifying our Community Center at their entrance; 4). two-way access to the Community Center
    Selectmen: Unanimous
    AC: Unanimous
    CEC: Unanimous
    Q: How do you come by the $425K for a new parking lot, already paved?
    CV: It was expensive parking to construct, due to drainage (~$300K)
    Q: Why wasn't this parking lot purchased with the original deal?
    CV: It wasn't a parking lot as part of the original deal - it was pine trees. Additional parking has emerged as an issue since the CC opened 20 months ago.
    Q: What is the "agreement"?
    CV: We have an agreement that we can each use the other's parking when needed for events.
    Q: This is an appropriation for the parking lot only, not other 3 parts, correct?
    CV: Correct
    YES mic: I'm supporting since we've made a major investment in this campus and also wouldn't like the parking lot to be sold to another entity that isn't the Town.
    Q: Do you know on average what percentage of users are not Lexington residents
    CV refers to staff person of CC (apologies, I do not know her name): About 6,000 memberships, fewer than 20% are not Lexington residents.
    Q: Could we limit parking to Lexington residents?
    CV staff person: We could.
    YES mic: We should think not in terms of "residents"; we should think in terms of "community".
    Q: According to Zoning Bylaw, what is the demand for this lot?
    CV: Can't answer
    Q: Perhaps the Planning board?
    CV: Pat Goddard reminded me that we needed 90 spaces as part of the building purchase.
    Requires 2/3 Majority vote
    Yes - 136
    No - 9
    Abstain - 6
    MOTION CARRIES

    Article 21 - Post Employment Insurance Liability FundTo see if the Town will vote to appropriate a sum of money to the Town of Lexington Post Retirement Insurance Liability Fund, as established by Chapter 317 of the Acts of 2002; determine whether the money shall be provided by the tax levy, by transfer from available funds, including enterprise funds, or by any combintion of these methods; or act in any other manner in relation thereto. (Inserted by the Board of Selectmen)
    • Funds Requested: $1,842,895
    • Description: This article will allow the Town to continue to fund its unfunded liability for post-employment benefits for Town of Lexington retirees. Beginning with the FY2007 audit, the Town was required to disclose this liability. In preparation for funding this liability, Town Meeting voted to request special legislation to establish a trust fund for this purpose. This special legislation was approved in 2002.
    Selectmen: 4 in support-1 recusal
    AC: support
    Simple Majority vote
    Yes - 126
    No - 8
    Abstain - 5
    MOTION CARRIES

    Article 27 - Prior Years’ Unpaid BillsTo see if the Town will vote to appropriate a sum of money from the Debt Service Stabilization Fund to offset the FY2018 debt service of the bond dated February 1, 2003 issued for additions and renovations to the Lexington High School, Clarke Middle School, and Diamond Middle School, as refunded with bonds dated December 8, 2011; or act in any other manner in relation thereto. (Inserted by the Board of Selectmen)
    • Funds Requested
    • Description: This is an annual article to request funds to pay bills after the close of the fiscal year in which the goods were received or the services performed and for which no money was encumbered.
    MOTION to Indefinitely Postpone carries unanimously


    Article 24 - Specified Stabilization FundsTo see if the Town will vote to create, amend, rename, and/or appropriate sums of money to and from Stabilization Funds in accordance with Section 5B of Chapter 40 of the Massachusetts General Laws for the purposed of: (a) Section 135 Zoning By-Law, (b) Traffic Mitigation, (c) Transportation Demand Management/Public Transportation, (d) School Bus Transportation; (e) Special Education, (f) Center Improvement District; (g) Debt Service, (h) Transportation Management Overlay District, (i) Capital; (j) Payment in Lieu of Parking; and (k) Avalon Bay School Enrollent Mitigation Fund and determine whether the money shall be provided by the Tax levy, by transfer from available funds, or by any combination of these methods; or act in any other manner in relation thereto. (Inserted by the Board of Selectmen)
    • Funds Requested: $7,690,398
    • Description: This article proposed to establish and/or fund Stabilization Funds for specific purposes and to appropriate funds therefrom. Money in those funds may be invested and the interest may then become a part of the particular fund. These funds may later be appropriated for the specific designated purpose, by a two-thirds vote of an Annual or Special Town Meeting , for any lawful purpose.
    Requires 2/3 Majority Vote
    Selectmen: Supports
    AC: Supports
    CEC: Supports
    Yes - 142
    No - 1
    Abstain - 1
    MOTION CARRIES

    Article 30 - Retirement COLA Base for RetireesTo see if the Town will vote to raise the base amount upon which cost of living adjustments are calculated for retirees from $13,000 to $14,000 as authorized by Section 103(j) of Chapter 32 of the Massachusetts General Laws, or act in any other manner in relation thereto. (Inserted by the Board of Selectmen at the Request of the Retirement Board)

    • Description: This article requests Town Meeting to approve the acceptance by the Retirement Board of a $1,000 increase in the maximum base amount upon which a retiree's cost-of-living adjustment is calculated.
    Once passed, this increase cannot be retracted.
    Selectmen: Unanimously with one recusal
    AC: Majority 6-2-1 abstention
    Question about the structure of the COLA; follow up on the "actuarial table".
    Bob Cunha, Retirement Board: worked with the Assistant Town Manager (who is on the Retirement Board).
    Question as to why 3% and not CPI
    Bob Cunha, Retirement Board: a number of factors taken into consideration, includig impact on Town, sustainability, etc.
    Impacts ~350 retirees.
    YES mic: We're voting on giving 350 of our retirees an additional $30 /year. I see no reason why we should not vote to approve.
    NO mic: Convinced by the minority opinion; this is not frugal. Wait until full amoritazation is reached.
    YES mic: A question of finances; our former employees are hoping for a small increase.
    Q: Are pension benefits not part of collective bargaining?
    CV: The are set by State law.
    Requires Simple Majority Vote
    Yes - 100
    No - 30
    Abstain - 8
    MOTION CARRIES
    We are adjourned until Monday, April 3, 2017, 7:30 PM
    10:30 PM that's a wrap
    - - -

    Monday, March 27, 2017

    LegCon Update to Board Colleagues

    Always a challenge - and an opportunity! - to re-cap and synthesize a national conference, especially a legislative conference as dense as NASBE's, for BESE colleagues. Here goes. 

    Take-aways from NASBE's 2017 Legislative Conference: Leading in a Time of Change

    This was my second NASBE LegCon (and fifth NASBE conference overall) since my appointment to BESE. The focus: federal education issues affecting states, with ESSA taking center stage. Each session offered insight into emerging issues under ESSA and strategies to connect policy with practice while advancing equity and excellence in education in times of change. As always, it's most gratifying to connect and learn from other State Board Members: the change that's happening in education is creating unprecedented opportunity for State leadership to shape education policy.
    • Following an orientation session for new board members, Sunday's Quarterly Board of Director's Meeting (the Board is charged with setting all policy for the association) kicked off over lunch at noon. We were briefed by staff and members of the leadership team:
      • NASBE is now fully staffed and has welcomed a Communications Associate and a Project Manager for Hewlett and Wallace work.
      • Finances are in great shape, with thanks to NASBE's Treasurer and Finance Director.
      • A number of working groups were activated:
        • Bylaws
        • Dues
        • The Future of Study Groups
        • Staff Policies + Procedures Review
      • Work continues apace for the Annual Conference in Atlanta GA (November 1-4, 2017)
    • Monday's Opening General Session featured remarks from US Education Secretary Betsy DeVos and Senator Chris Murphy (D-CT).
      • The Secretary said she wants to "break the bad habit of the Department of Education being in your way" and that "the president's budget reflects this". (ICYMI: the president has proposed a roughly $9.2 billion cut to US ED, thus commencing the budget convo). Says, "nothing short of excellence should be a common theme" and "we should not rest until each child has an opportunity to learn and thrive". She spoke for about 8 minutes and took no questions. My take-away: The Secretary has a huge responsibility, but the budget, if passed as proposed, will decimate the US Department of Education and she fully supports the president's budget.
      • Senator Chris Murphy said he's a "proud product of the public school system" and that he's "proud of this country's innovative idea to provide public education". He's "hopeful about ESSA" and that the "Department of Education was going to help schools and districts". He said, "the proposed budget is catastrophic" and "a preview of what is going to come, if we aren't successful". He warned that "setting the bar too low will feed the idea that you don't need the Department of Ed...they want to say that the public education system cannot deliver and give support to privatized education". He encouraged SBEs to "build high standards". The Senator spoke for about 15 minutes and took questions. Take-away: US ED will be a "light touch" and States must be bold, strengthen collaboration skills with local districts and stakeholders.
    • General Session + Moderated Panel Discussion: Forging Partnerships to Shape and Advance Education Policy Agendas: Players, Perspectives, and Possibilities. Panelists: former WV Governor Bob Wise, President of Alliance for Excellent Education; Cheryl Oldham, US Chamber of Commerce; Marla Ucelli-Kashyap, AFT; Merrit Jones, Student voice; Kris Amundson, NASBE President/CEO (moderator). Take-away: Broad, inclusive engagement of diverse stakeholders is not a "nice to have" but essential to building and sustaining education policies that improve opportunities and outcomes for all students -> ->Is MA up to the task?
    • General Session: Components of a Changing Education Policy Agenda. Panelists: David Griffith, ASCD; Melissa Tooley, New America; Robin Lake, Center on Reinventing Public Education; Robert Hull, NASBE; Abigail Potts, NASBE (moderator). Take-away: With new authority to determine the components of a high-quality education, SBEs should identify major educational opportunities as they plan their policy agenda for the future.
    • Policy Landscapes and the Environment for 2017: How will Upcoming Federal Policy Affect State Actions? Panelists: Reg Leichty, Foresight Law + Policy; Patrick Lyden, Current Government Relations. Take-away: Connect with federal legislators early and check-in with them regularly.
    • Concurrent Session: Exploring Options for Parents: Innovation & Alternatives in Schooling. Panelists: Todd Ziebarth, National Alliance for Public Charter Schools; Robin Lake, Center on Reinventing Public Education; Todd Mann, Magnet Schools of America; Paige Kowalski, Data Quality Campaign (panelist + moderator). Take-away: Expanding options in schooling are advancing.
    • Concurrent Session: Relentless Pursuit of Equity in Education Policy. Panelists: Peter Cookson, AIR; Guy Johnson, Partners for Each and Every Child; Dr.Estela Lopez, CT/SBE; Kimberly Charis, NASBE; Abigail Potts, NASBE (moderator). Take-away: SBEs must encourage equity discussions that informs policymaking supporting racial equity and the needs of historically underserved students.
    • General Session: Questions Boards Should Ask About Their ESSA State Plans. Panelists: John King, Former US Secretary of Education, The Education Trust; Kris Amundson, NASBE President/CEO; Michael Magee, Chiefs for Change; Sandra Boyd, Achieve (moderator). Take-away: SBEs must be the citizen voice at the table.
    • Northeast Area Breakfast Meeting. SBE Members from CT, DC, DE, MA, ME were present, providing comments, suggestions, and feedback for NASBE.
    • General Session with Congressman Todd Rokita (R-IN). He's the Chair of the Subcommittee on Early Childhood, Elementary, and Secondary Education and Vice Chair of the House Budget Committee. As a House Representative, he's also a co-author of ESSA. He shared this thoughts on ESSA saying, "accountability is a good thing" and "it's up to states to decide what that looks like". NASBE President/CEO Amundson pushed back on new template, saying "it has unwound some of the intent of ESSA on stakeholder engagement further than the law allows". Rokita said he "will support NASBE on this issue" and that "focus will shift next to the Higher Education Act" (HEA). When asked, "What do you see and what is your view on choice" he said, "I'm a State's rights guy, so why would I be for a federal mandate on choice? The president referenced a $20 billion figure, so how does that $20 billion look? Probably in tax credits" and that he's "not seeing a Title I transfer". Take-away: Unclear this will happen before Congressional mid-term elections.
    • General Session: Public Launch of State Board Insight. Panelists: Robert Hull, NASBE; Sarah-Jane Lorenzo, NASBE; John-Paul Hayworth, DC/SBE. A new database was unveiled: it's drawn from publicly reported SBE meeting minutes and agendas with a potential to help SBEs, researchers, journalists, educators, and community members uncover key insights about ESSA and more. Take-away: Check it out HERE.
    • After lunch, to conclude our conference, Student Representative Nathan Moore and I visited with Congresswoman Clark's and Senator Warren's Legislative Staff. We shared NASBE's concerns on Fiscal Years 2017 and 2018 Appropriations Priorities, Perkins CTE, and E-rate + Lifeline Programs:
      • Congress should fully fund ESSA programs with a focus on the law's major formula programs and other initiatives designed to promote educational equity.
      • Congress should reauthorize the Perkins CTE this year and commit to ensuring that more students, particularly students in low-income communities, have access to high quality CTE opportunities aligned to higher education, business, and industry needs.
      • Lawmakers should strongly support the E-rate and the Lifeline Programs, which are critical tools for connecting students to broadband services.
    Announcements
    • Each year, NASBE recognizes distinguished leaders for their contributions to improving education for all children. Information about making those nominations, as well as for nominations to the 2018 Board of Directors will be forthcoming from NASBE.
    • Save the Dates:
      • New Member Institute, Renaissance Arlington Capital View, Arlington VA, June 9-10, 2017 (as a NASBE member State, NASBE pays hotel and airfare for members up to 18-months into their term on BESE).
      • Annual Conference, Atlanta GA, Westin Buckhead Atlanta, November 1-4, 2017
    Please be in touch with any questions or comments.

    Protect federal online privacy rules

    Cross-posting the latest from the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF), because it's the best round of posts on this issue, plus a CTA, HERE. Ars Technica has also been covering this well, HERE.

    Senator Markey was harshly critical of the GOP proposal to roll back protections on broadband privacy. New York Times News Services covered it when the vote was taken last Thursday and Boston.com picked it up HERE; TruthDig reported out Saturday, HERE.

    The vote passed straight down party lines, 50-48 (2 GOP/MoCs absent) on a CRA resolution to repeal the FCC's privacy rules and the resolution is in the House, awaiting a scheduled vote tomorrow - Tuesday, March 28.

    If the proposal passes in the House it will dismantle our legal rights to privacy - rights we haven't had to think about for more than twenty years. Upshot? We're one vote away from a world where "your ISP can track your every move online and sell that information to the highest bidder".

    Don't let Congress undermine our online privacy. Call your Congressperson. Now. Tell them to protect federal online privacy rules*. There are links in the EFF link at the top of this post, or maybe you already have him or her on speed dial...
    - - -
    *What to say (via EFF): I'm your constituent and I urge you to oppose the CRA resolution to kill the FCC's privacy rules.

    Sunday, March 26, 2017

    Hill Visits with Congresswoman Clark's + Senator Warren's Legislative Staff

    At the end of NASBE's Legislative Policy Conference, Student Representative Nathan Moore and I visited with legislative staff in Congresswoman Katherine Clark's and Senator Elizabeth Warren's DC offices. We shared concerns about the Perkins Career and Technical Education Act (CTE), E-rate + Lifeline Programs, and FY17 and FY18 Budgets.

    Perkins CTE Recent studies have shown that CTE dual enrollment programming may be a particularly effective high school and college completion strategy. The House reauthorized CTE last year, following on a bill introduced by Congresswoman Katherine Clark and Congressman Glenn Thompson.
    • There's broad, bi-partisan support for career and technical education and House and Senate education committees are working again this year to update the law.
    • Although it's not expected Congress will change the law significantly, the reauthorization process offers an opportunity to address key State Board recommendations for improving the quality of CTE programs and expanding opportunities for students to access them.
    • This work naturally connects to ESSA's requirement that States align their core academic and CTE standards. Congress should commit to ensuring that more students, particularly students in low-income communities, have access to high quality CTE opportunities aligned to higher education, business, and industry needs.
    E-rate + Lifeline Programs Lawmakers should strongly support the E-rate + Lifeline Programs, which are critical tools for connecting students to broadband services.
    • Last year, the FCC updated the 30-year-old Lifeline program to permit low-income families to use the subsidy for broadband services. (Lifeline was established by the FCC in 1985 to help poor households gain access to "plain old telephone service"). Recognizing the increasingly vital importance of broadband access to daily life, including addressing the "homework gap", the FCC hopes the 2016 program update will help more families acquire home broadband services at meaningful connection speeds.
    • Among other changes, the new Lifeline will provide support for stand-alone mobile or fixed broadband Internet access service, require WiFi functionality, and ensures minimum connection speeds.
    • Although greater funding will ultimately be needed to ensure all low-income families have access to broadband, the FCC's action is a strong step in the right direction. The FCC's decision complements the agency's work to update the E-rate program in 2015. The FCC's E-rate update was long overdue and provided critically needed new support to expand WiFi in schools and grow the program to better meet the broadband required to meet students' and teachers' needs.
    Fiscal Years 2017 and 2018 Appropriations Priorities Congress should fully fund the Every Student Succeeds Act's (ESSA's) programs, with a focus on the law's major formula programs and other initiatives designed to promote educational equity. The president's proposed budget eliminates ~ $9.2 billion from the Department of Education's (ED's) budget.
    • Congress is working to complete ED's Fiscal Year 2017 budget by April 28 (the date when the current temporary funding bill expires), while also beginning the Fiscal Year 2018 spending process. This unusual procedural overlap, coupled with proposed deep spending cuts, means that State Board Members and other leaders must be strong advocates for federal education investments.
    • The strict federal spending caps by the Budget Control Act of 2011 (sequestration) remain in effect and Congress will soon make difficult decisions about how to allocate limited federal resources. The president asked Congress to increase defense spending by over $50 billion. Under his proposed budget, non-defense programs would be reduced to pay for this defense increase, including significant cuts to ESSA's Title II (professional development for teachers and school leaders), career and technical education, and the 21st Century Community Learning Centers program (after school and extended learning time programs).
    • Congress may not approve the president's proposals and education champions will work hard to help Members of Congress understand the critical role that federal funding plays in supporting schools, especially the significant additional funding provided to States and districts for serving low-income, disabled, and English learner students.
    - - - - -
    Select Resources:
    Career/Vocational Technical Education on DESE's website, includes frameworks and other interesting info about C/VTE

    The Massachusetts Department of Higher Education released its report on The Degree Gap June 8, 2016

    NASBE maintains an online State Policy Database of College, Career, & Civic Readiness Regulations Governing Education Systems in the US


    From the Office of Management and Budget: President's FY18 Proposed Budget (see pp. 17-18 for ED)