Wednesday, November 29, 2017

Yes for Lexington

Due to a "a glitch in the system further up the food chain", the letter of support for the Yes for Lexington Campaign signed by former members of the Lexington School Committee didn't make it into last week's Minuteman newspaper. Please remember to vote this Monday, December 4 -- and I hope you will support these projects.

November 19, 2017

To the Editor:
As former members of the Lexington School Committee, we have advocated for all children in our public schools. In each decade there are challenges that our town must work through to assure excellent and equitable education.
We have seen a steady rise in the student population over the last 6 years.
The School Committee has studied capacity at every school to determine gaps, and evaluated short-term and long-term construction solutions.  They also changed the policy on school assignment, allowing the administration to optimize available seats town-wide. Although some in town believe that money can be saved by increasing class sizes, they are mistaken. This idea has been examined and rejected by school committees for more than a decade because it assigns students to schools based simply on space availability without considering the myriad other factors involved in student assignment. No school committee has been prepared to sacrifice individual students' education to some theoretical vision of maximum efficiency.
Meanwhile, the current School Committee has worked with all relevant committees to monitor conditions at all school facilities and update the school portion of Lexington’s Master Plan.
The projects on the ballot are a result of this planning process, and include a new site for the public preschool “Lexington Children’s Place - LCP” and a new Hastings.
LCP is where our youngest children with special needs have gotten their start at a fair chance for an appropriate education for the last 20 years, despite being moved to multiple facilities. Relocating LCP will free space at Harrington elementary and help alleviate elementary overcrowding.
The new Hastings will also alleviate system-wide overcrowding.
We endorse all three questions, as the schools rely on the Fire Department for public safety.
We urge you to vote Yes! on all three questions Monday, December 4.

Bonnie Brodner, Trodden Path
Scott Burson, Cary Avenue
Helen Cohen, Patterson Road
Rod Cole, School Street
Margaret Coppe, Barrymeade Drive
Judy Crocker, Currier Court
Tom Griffiths, Massachusetts Avenue
Bill Hurley, Young Street
Florence Koplow, Brent Road
Judy Leader, Fairfield Drive
Barrie Peltz, Jackson Court

Mary Ann Stewart, Rawson [Avenue]

Saturday, November 4, 2017

NASBE Town Hall

Jay Barth, NASBE Chair
John Kelly, NASBE Chair-elect
Kris Amundson, NASBE President & CEO

Amundson: 5 Takeaways from the Conference:
1. Our challenge now is to move beyond the state plan; it's about legacy leadership now.
Need to think about those children, epecially with regard to equity.
Children in poverty -- 30Million fewer words; they are two years behind when they come to school -- it is our problem to solve.
Thinking about what Gov. Deal said to us -- in Georgia, education is Pre-K through prison.

2. This is our moment -- the equity moment.
Answers are not going to come from DC, but from you all in the states.
There is no "magic pill".

3. SBEs can't do it alone.
You need tools and allies.
Need better understanding, better assessments.
Like Candice McQueen said: need to "get better at getting better".

4. It is so important that SBEs model civility.
Our work is not partisan.

5. SBEs all have day jobs.
You can't do all this by yourselves.
Reach out to NASBE -- it's why we are here!

Q from Delaware: Moved past the ESSA plans -- tax bill, what's on the horizon?
Amundson: Perkins; IDEA - that's really a complicated piece of work; I think more and more is going to come into state's hands
Barth: Continuing to examine [Executive] Orders from the last administration that end up affecting [SBE members]. On legislative front, CTE -- it's the area of unity in Congressional offices; in 2018 find some real unity for accomplishments.
Kelly: Don't get distracted by what's going on in DC. Under NCLB, it was pretty controlling, but you went about your business. Need to do that now, too.

Q from Kansas: I like "this is the equity moment", please address, "this is the citizen engagement moment".
Amundson: You all reached out to engage people in your ESSA plan (KS, WA in particular); that can't end. If that was a "one-and-done", you have wasted your time. If parents of children with disabilities, ELL, of color were at the table, they are not going to let you lower expectations. Keep them at the table to ensure that they will hold your feet to the fire -- it won't be pleasant, but it will be right.
Barth: If folks are not invited to the table, they will position themselves at the table. We know the power of social media to help. IDEA has so many "hot buttons" around it.
Kelly: Lots of folks now know what "good" looks like and they are not going to let you get away with anything less. The expectation is "I want for my child what you have for yours" and there is no turning the clock back.
Amundson: Look at Louisiana SBE, Chief -- trying very hard to address persistent gaps.
Kelly: The ESSA plan itself forces you to go there. Example: highest performing Mississippi school district had the widest gaps between white and black students.

Q from Nebraska: Many of us appreciate the resources that NASBE provides. Please share themes, topics to come in publications in near future.

Amundson invites NASBE Editorial Director, Valerie Norville, to the mic.

Norville: Have a terrific Editorial Advisory Committee. Next issue of the Standard is on Early Education, followed by, School Turnaround; School Finance; Wraparound Services; Stakeholder Engagement; School Leadership; Teaching and Learning. State Innovations format is to showcase innovations in the state -- let me know what's going on in your state.

-- End of Session --

Excellence through Equity

Presenter
Pedro Noguera, UCLA

Was once an elected local school board member in Berkley CA.
Didn't particularly like it.
Referred to it as "my sentence".
Thought we were only barely managing a "status quo" that didn't work for most kids.
We were cutting budgets all the time.
So, acknowledge how important this is.
Applaud you for your service.
In Colorado, can't fill many seats, can't get people to run for those offices.
That's a problem.
Democracy depends on people running.
I'm going to say some things to shake you up.
I think that's my job.

Need now for equity and deeper learning: making high standards and powerful learning opportunities available to all teachers and students.

Was in Alaska recently -- school leader there, "We do not know how to educate Alaska-native children".
There's a crisis.
High suicide rates.
Kids barely coming to school.

A failure of reform.
We have focused on the wrong things.
Our education policies have ignored social context and deeper systemic problems, particularly related to poverty.
We have relied on pressure and gimmicks to address chronic failure in schools serving poor children.
The persistence of race/class disparities in achievement is a by-product of social and economic inequality.
Reforms have not been devised or implemented with clear focus on how they will solve the problems schools face.
Reforms have not been implemented with the educators who must implement them.
Raising standards is unlikely to lead to better outcomes unless we improve learning conditions and respond more effectively to student needs.

Poverty is not a learning disability, but, when needs of children are not addressed, made manifest in school.
Not simply hunger, housing, health.
Lots of kids can't read -->because they don't have eyeglasses -->and we don't have a plan to address that.
Children have social and emotional needs that we are only just beginning to recognize.
Bill to address Trauma in California.
We recognize trauma in veterans -- it is a disorder (PTSD); in children, it's chronic.
As a nation, we haven't come to terms with trauma.

Was in Florida -- at a "FFF" school. Principal says, "FFF" means have failed the state exam three times in a row. Will fail it again. State will take over. He's leaving.

Opportunity to utilize higher order thinking skills -- analysis, evaluation, application, creativity.
To undertake and learn through complex tasks and challenging texts.
To acquire skills needed for college -- independent research; critical/analytical thinking.
To produce high-quality work that serves as a reflection of what a student has learned -- mastery.

Time to focus on equity and deeper learning.
Want to focus on learning -- not focus on gimmicks: like, ooh - iPADs. Extended day.
Not just extending the day -->need to improve the day.
Need to focus that all kids are challenged or else the kids fail.
Teachers quit.
Education is one of the first professions where we put the least experienced people in the job.

Access to challenging learning opportunities is an equity issue:
  • We have used assessment to rationalize sorting/tracking students and often teachers.
  • We have traditionally *dumbed down* the curriculum for students we thought were not *college ready*.
    • We have confused academic performance with intellectual ability and potential.
  • We have not given teachers sufficient guidance in how to teach a variety of learners.
Gap between ability and performance.
Gotta approach this differently.
Gotta take equity seriously.
NCLB sounded pretty serious but we left lots of children behind.
All kids are different.
Some need more time.

Equity is: 
  • Addressing the needs of all students
    • academic, psychological, emotional
  • Recognizing differences, compensating for disadvantages, and mitigating harm, hardships, and risks to all students
State boards must stay foused on outcomes -- academic and developmental, and conditions in schools.
Success is not only about achievement.

Equity is not:
  • Lowering standards
  • Something only schools serving poor children of color should be concerned about
  • Choosing some children over others -- all children must be challenged to reach their potential.
Affluent white children more likely to be stressed out.
Pervasive inequality makes the pursuit of equity difficult, but essential.

Challenges to equity include:
  • Out-of-school Factors: poverty, unequal access to basic needs health, housing, transportation, etc.
  • Policy Factors: unequal school funding and unequal learning opportunities.
  • In-school Practices: disciplining for disadvantages, lack of focus on meeting the needs of all students.
Too often, schools reproduce patterns of privilege and disadvantage.
This achievement gap is a manifestation of privilege and disadvantage. 
Alienation starts early.
There's a Trajectory of Marginalization -- the progression of disengagement.
Lots of kids in prison pipeline -- had we intervened early, wouldn't be there.
More than $230K/child per year on juvenile justice system in LA and less than $10,000/person in school-->we're investing at the wrong end.

What we know about child development:
  • Student achievement is affected by a variety of social, psychological, emotional, and environmental factors
  • Services must be provided in a coordinated manner to counter effects of poverty and improve developmental and learning outcomes
We have proof -- just look at Harlem Children's Zone.
Geoffrey Canada has been at this for 25 years.
Need evidence that fixing your teeth or eyeglasses is a good idea?
We do have evidence what happens when you meet the needs of the Whole Child.
Brockton High on a path for success for 20 years -- then they hit it -- Level 1 school.
Worcester Tech -- success.
Success is all around us.

Key Elements of the Brockton Strategy:
  • Brockton started with shared leadership -- teachers own the work.
  • Concerted effort to obtain buy-in around the strategy
  • A coherent strategy focused on student needs
  • Differentiated professional development
  • Follow through, examining the evidence, sticking with it
Not test prep -- actually have to teach the children.
Differentiated professional development -- not all teachers need the same things.
Creat conditions where all kids can be successful.
If we focus on the right conditions, it is no longer predictable which children will fail.
Students in control of learning-->Hollenbeck Middle School, Los Angeles
Not just learning Math -- learning how to work together.
Differentiated learning for kids.
Teachers are facilitators of learning.
Not about behavior control -- it's about engagement.
The bell rings and they are disturbed -- not packing up 10 mins early.
If you can do that in East Los Angeles, you can do that anywhere.
Hollenbeck is right down the street from [Garfield] High School.
He was teaching the desire to learn.
Come in on Saturdays. Stay late.
Instead of focusing on achivement -- we must focus on engagement.
Get excited about learning.

Pathway to achievement is through engagement:
  • Behavioral engagement
    • Preparation
    • Persistence
    • Instrumental Help Seeking
  • Cognitive engagement
    • Deep Processing
    • Meta-Cognition
  • Emotional engagement 
    • Interest
    • Value
California County prisons are educating inmates through Project-Based Learning.

Teachers focus on Evidence on Learning: 
  • Make expectations clear and standards explicit
  • Model and expose students to high-quality work
  • Utilize diagnostig tools to check for understanding
  • Learn about their students' interests in order to make lessons culturally relevant
  • Expect students to revise and resubmit work
  • Solicit feedback and questions from students
  • Analyze student work with a focus on evidence of competence and mastery and with a willingness to reflect on efficacy of methods
Real learning is in the REVISION.
Real teaching is in the FEEDBACK.
Most powerful PD is Teachers coming together to analyze student work.

Social and emotional learning must be integral to effort to increase academic engagement (aka LIFE SKILLS):
  • Deferred gratification
  • Ability to collaborate
  • Impulse control
  • Ability to resolve and mediate conflicts
  • Empathy
As SBE members, you get to ask questions.
Move away from compliance to capacity building.
Great colleges and universities don't create master teachers; they can create great novices.

State Boards Must Stay Focused on the Five Essential Ingredients:
  • A coherent instructional guidance system
  • Ongoing development of the professional capacity of staff
  • Srtong parent-community-school ties
  • A student-centered learning climate
  • Shared leadership to drive change
Need a holistic vision to achieve equity in outcomes.
Gotta think about the Whole Child.
Once common for every Kindergarten to have a piano in the classroom and for the K teacher to know how to play it.
People with Alzheimer's -- the last thing to go are the songs and music they learned early in life.

Amundson & Pedro
Amundson: SBEs are policy makers, so how can we ensure that Ts are high-quality?
Pedro: Incentivize to bring master teachers into high-need schools. Residency-mentoring for the first year of teaching. Districts need to write that into policy. Sensible practices into policy. SBEs can create standards by which Ts can become certified and evaluated. Those 5 essential ingredients for schools...the Brockton stragegy...to bring about coherence...need literacy to do math, science and everything else...when we see schools are struggling, see how they are doing on those 5 elements.

Q from DE: Wilmington stuggles like other places. Politics. How can we help them to overcome themselves to affect change?
Pedro: I will leave the politics. I would start positive. Look at  Karin Chenoweth's book, "It's being Done" and her next book, "How it's Being Done".

Q from MS: Lots resonated with me. Equity is not about lowering standards. How do I get Principals to understand that so that teachers understand that?
Pedro: TOY in GA -- T was sent to struggling school. Sent a signal: IB programs. Kids will be safe. Kids will be well-served. All the kids. Need to shine the light on high-functioning places where it is working. Should not assign brand new principals to lead struggling schools. We haven't learned from it. 

Q from GA Teacher in HE: Equity MUST be central to our work. As a Education Leadership provider, EVALUATION and STANDARDS -- glaring missing link on equity...thoughts on influencing policy?
Pedro: Broadening what we look at. Equity-based accountability system. Schools that are beating the odds. If you don't have the policy guidelines, will never be able to acknowledge. Lots of gaming strategies: yeah, higher grad rates, but remediation in college courses and high percentages of dropping out in first years.

Q from KY: The slide about lowering standards, all means all. Still, some kids have not received anything. Need for targeted strategies? Gives more to what hasn't been done before? Equal access. How to deal with the resource Q?
Pedro: If we're serious about equity, it will be reflected in outcomes. Places are figuring it out. Example: Algebra is a gateway course. Kids who don't have it, get double the time with a master teacher on it. Also less homework. Need to make space for innovation.

-----
Panel Presentation: Reenvisioning Success for Students and Schools

Presenters
Pedro Noguera, NCSEAD
Gene Wilhoit, NCSEAD
Rachel Wise, Nebraska SBE and NASBE Chair-elect
Jacqueline JodlDirector NCSEAD (moderator)

Schoolhouse and State House alike have emphasized the academic skills students need to succeed. But overwhelming evidence demands a complementary focus on social and emotional skills and competencies. When somebody is doing it well, we need to stop and pay attention.

Shriver: We have a whole script and I'm going to blow it off -- you can't listen to Pedro and not adjust. Lots of different people have come together to form this work. Grassroots. Roots in 60s, 70s -- some would say even as far back as John Dewey.
Learned to use Jim Comer's framework*: academic, social, emotional.
The social and emotional ARE learning.
Learning is relational.
Lots of attention to academic; almost none to SEL.
Not as a replacement to academics, but to complement, to engage the heart.
Every problem for kids at-risk will eventually be a problem for the other kids.
They are the canary in the coalmine.
Equity = justice.
Cannot dichotomize academic and SEL.
"We don't have time"; "We don't have resources" --- false dichotomy.
Integrate them in a high quality way.
All kids: for stressed-out high wealth kids and low income kids.

(Aaand - this is where I was listening to the panel discussion and not taking notes!)

Q&A
Q: One of the barriers is initiative overload. It overwhelms teachers. Reflections on that?
Shriver: It is THE problem in school reform. Not because it is [teachers'] disposition, it is because it is done poorly. Need a sustainable plan. A change process under one plan. Get out of "check the box". Need systematic, integrated strategy/plan. Otherwise we will alienate teachers, and rightly so.
Pedro: Gates has another new initiative --> hasn't shared the lessons of previous initiatives. An arrogance that creates deep cynicism. He should say, "We wasted a lot of money and this is what we have learned"..."Here's some things we will not do again". Otherwise, not changing the culture of learning.
Shriver: CASEL -- launched collaborating districts. Understood we were in for multiple years. Created contiuous commitment. Ownership has changed. Owning it together.

Q from MI: Structure of learning: first tedium, then enjoyment. Comments on that experience?
Shriver: Learning has emotional underpinings, isn't the only way it plays out. Emotions are the internalization of the learning. Recognizing is the art of teaching. Mystics talk about relationships in community. Solitude, even. Always operating, even when they are not physical. Coping strategies. Mindfulness as a tool for perserverance. 
Jodl: Instruction needs to be student-centered; equitable.

Q from Nebraska: Models for scope and sequence? Impact on class, culture, and community?
Pedro: Science is most popular class for students in elementary school. Imagine capitalizing on all of that early learning for science.
Wilhoit: Tools for Students to assess their own learning.

Jodl: Commission will "sunset" in the 4th quarter of 2018. Will issue a report. Change agenda to include: local focus, as well as the practice piece for sustaining the work.

Hull: Legacy Leadership. NCLB result of neglect of leadership. Legacy of SBEs taking advantage now, at this time. Not all means all. All means each.

-- End of Session --
* From Wikipedia: Though a principal-led but shared management framework, organizationally and/or primarily by the school staff, organizational, management, and communication issues are pulled together in a way that promotes collaboration, assessment, capacity building, and a focus on teaching in a way that leads to the integration of student development and academic learning. By minimizing confusion and conflict in the building system through this process, educators can make sound programmatic decisions based on student behavioral, developmental, and learning needs; and intentionally prepare students for school and mainstream life success. Our outcomes suggest that when students are developing well they will learn well.
While the School Development Program helps building level participants bring about change, it has been used as a framework for system-wide reform, providing mechanisms by which school boards and district central administration can coordinate and support the reform work at each school.

Friday, November 3, 2017

Leading Innovation to Advance Teaching and Learning

Presenters
Ash Vasudeva, Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching (Research)
Glen Harvey, WestEd (Policy)
Candice McQueen, Tennessee Commissioner of Education (Practice)
Robert Hull, NASBE (moderator)

Hull:
How do you think creatively to solve a problem? This session brings together leading experts in reasearch, policy, and practice to consider how state board members can pursue and support innovation. How can improvement science foster a more user- and problem-centered approach to improving teaching and learning? We will explore ways to build state capacity to identify, adapt, and scale up promising innovations.

Vasudeva:
Collectively, we expand decades of research, practice, and policy-making.
Wisdom in this room, and classrooms -- education systems continue to face extraordinary challenges.
Many times, "what gives" is a rich and rewarding educational experience.
[Missed the name of the person referenced in his example here]: Addressing families at large community forums: first thing is stating/admitting that "they don't have it all figured out".
Just giving voice to that moved the dynamic from confrontation to communication.
Expertise alone is not enough - need to work with others to accomplish goals.
Form new relationships.
Admitting we don't have all of the answers doesn't mean there's nothing we can do.
(Introduces concept of "Discipline Inquiry" - create teams to test solutions and commit to make meaningful progress).
Disciplined inquiry bridges the organizational journey from compliance to continuous improvement by attending to and focusing on learning.
References the book: Learning to Improve
ESSA represents the opportunity to make this shift (^ from enacting policy from "compliance" to "continuous improvement" by attending to and focusing on learning).
Three questions for consideration:

1. What is the relationship between research and practice?
2. What constitutes evidence?
3. What is the role for policy?

Researchers are expected to innovate; practitioners are expected to implement.
Need to connect research to practice.
ESSA plans for making progress.
Use discipline inquiry in service to innovation and improvement:

Evidence - Disciplined Inquiry = Compliance Modes of Thinking

Evidence + Disciplined Inquiry = Improvement Mindset

As SBEs, how do you use your policy superpowers? (Power to Convene; Power of the Question; Power of Policy)

McQueen
Reality on the ground when you try to put research to practice.
It's messy.
TN articulated a Vision: for all students to have knowledge and skills to successfully embark upon their chosen path in life.
Comprised five priorities - 4 of them very policy driven; they are:
  • Early Foundations & Literacy;
  • High School & Bridge to Postsecondary;
  • All Means All;
  • Educator Support.
The last one, District Empowerment would use research for solving problems in practice through newly created Network Improvement Communities (NIC, in 7 districts).
Utilizing NICs:
  • Foster a new kind of working relationship between the state and districts
  • Leverage collective expertise to solve a statewide challenge
  • Identify scalable solutions to common implementation challenges that hold the state back from achieveing its goals
  • Learn at all levels how to "get better at getting better": and develop a collective sense of ownership for the work to sustain progress
Learning to date:

  • Improving literacy outcomes
    • communication between teachers and interventionists is important for success
  • Empowering district innovation
    • culture of learning and sharing is critical to making progress
  • Engaging educators in continuous impovement efforts
    • educators must want to learn from one another through a community approach
What's next?
  • Scale and spread the NIC approach
    • Spring 2016: Cohort 1 = 7 districts in 2 CORE regions
    • Fall 2017: Cohort 2 = 21 districts in all 8 CORE regions
People sometimes don't want the process, they want the pill.
Reality is, when they know the outcome they will work to embed in practice.
Go slow at first; once familiar, then can go fast.

Harvey:
Learned so much from [NASBE sessions] yesterday.
Thank you for the TN story - grew up in KY, not a leader in education reform; it's empowering to see how much can be accomplished over time.
State policy role in supporting innovation...
What is innovation anyway:

"A process that creates something that addresses a specific need effectively in a new and different way with better outcomes creating value"

Emphasis on "different" and "better"
Problem is, if it is "new and different", it probably doesn't have a lot of evidence.
Need to balance tried-and-true practices with something new.
What's your capacity for innovation?
To take risks?
What's the pulse in your state?
SBEs: Champion of children and their right to an equitable, quality education:
  • Convenor, giving voice to others -- stakeholder engagement through listening tours, town halls, and focus groups
    • good ideas can come from anyone and anywhere
    • model openness to new ideas and different perspectives
    • create a process for exploring promising new ideas
    • communicate back what you have heard and will do
    • keep the dialogue going
  • Visionary and catalyst for change, keeping the public's collective eye on what matters most
    • use the power of the bully pulpit
    • be the state's storyteller
    • keep everyone's eye on the state's North Star (the big idea)
    • focus on big ideas, enduring problems, and solutions
    • use the power of persuasion, vision, staying power
  • Enabler and empowerer, removing barriers to innovation (removing policy so people can move forward):
    • NH: flexibility to achieve a big idea (i.e., competency-based learning)
    • CA: flexibility focused on state and local indicators (i.e., a local control funding formula; school safety and climate)
    • CO: flexibility to spark innovation for learning (CO Innovations Schools Act -- ask for waivers from SBE to move forward)
Create opportunity.
Need to do better by those children who are not doing well right now (especially to consider homeless, foster, trauma, i.e.).
Before establishing a new policy based on local innovation, ask:
  • Is this new approach addressing a specific need?
  • Is there sufficient evidence that it addresses the need effectively?
  • Is there a solid research base?
  • Is the solution economically viable?
  • Is it scalable and sustainable?
  • Do we have the capacity to implement, scale, and sustain across the state?
  • Is there stakeholder buy-in?
  • What unintended consequences might there be?
Q&A:
Ohio asks about Trauma-informed education; says, under ESSA, Title II funds available for this.
Massachusetts asks TN about importance of aligning standards with work in the NICs.

-- End of Session --

Thursday, November 2, 2017

Rethinking Teaching and Learning

Presenters: Linda Darling-Hammond, Learning Policy Institute; Donna Johnson, Delaware State Board of Education

Session takes a deep dive into a rethinking of teaching and learning with leading researcher; covering recent research on professional learning and a systems approach to retooling curriculum and instruction. "Only well-prepared, culturally skilled, committed techers can ensure that all students graduate ready for college and careers".

Darling-Hammond is live-streaming with us online.

D-H: What kind of learning are we talking about?
Demand for skills is changing.
Top skills for Fortune 500 companies in 1970 were Reading, Writing, and Arithmetic; today, they are teamwork, problem-solving, communication skills.
Knowledge is expanding and exponentially.
Working with technology that hasn't been invented yet.
Need to transfer knowledge to new problems.

Teaching for learning ability, the abilities to:
  • Transfer and apply knowledge
  • Analyze, evaluate, weigh, and balance
  • Communicate and collaborate
  • Take initiative
  • Find and use resources
  • Plan and implement
  • Learn to learn
Includes social emotional learning:
  • Know and manage self and emotions, including stress
  • Have empathy and interpersonal skills
  • Engage in positive relationships
  • Collaborate well
  • Make good decisions
  • Behave ethically and responsibly
  • Have a growth mindset
  • Be resourceful, perservering, and resilient
Teaching SEL skills has been found to foster personal, social, and academic success and reduce opportunity gaps

Teaching these skills -- to what end? 
  • Resolving conflict
  • Sustaining the earth
  • Sustaining people
    • Employment
    • Food and shelter
    • Clean water
  • Nurturing peaceful collaboration
  • Developing new products, solutions, strategies for living and learning
And Authentic Learning:
  • Problem-based and Project-based learning
  • Performance assessment
  • Rubrics  for self-, peer-, and teacher-evaluation
  • A pedagogy of revision and mastery
How well are we teaching higher order skills refers to trends on PISA 2000-2012. (Answer: not very well)

What kinds of schools can create these abilities?
  • Schools designed for effective caring
  • Small Learning Communities
  • Looping
  • Long-term Relationships
  • Advisory systems
  • Close parental contact
Some states and many nations are transforming assessments. High achievers use:
  • Open-ended essays and problems to be solved and explained
  • Performance tasks that require students to design and conduct investigations, collect data analyze and present findings in writing, orally, and with technology
Effective teachers:
  • Engage students in active learnning
  • Build on children's experiences and prior knowledge
  • Create intellectually ambitious tasks that apply knowledge to real world problems
  • Develop and effectively manage a culturally responsive, collaborative classroom in which all students have membership
  • Use a variety of teaching strategies
  • Assess learning to adapt teaching to student needs
  • Create effective scaffolds for language and content learning
  • Provide clear standards strong models, constant feedback, and opportunities for revising work
  • Reinforce students' competence and confidence
Recommends book: A Pedagogy of Confidence (on amazon and short video clip HERE) by Yvette Jackson:
  • Focus on strengths
  • Teach cognitive strategies
  • Build confidence and motivation
  • Build educator capacity
Topic moves into teachers and professional collaboration and learning:
  • Shared planning time
  • Teaching reams
  • Regular professional development
  • Inquiry about student learning
  • Problem solving around students
  • Leadership focused on instruction
There are schools where this is happening.
However, United States teachers spend the most time on instruction and the least amount of time on planning than other leading nations.
Curriculum and teaching access matters for learning: Holding SES constant, students of color and white students who have equally well-qualified teachers and comparable curriculum, perform comparably in reading and mathematics.
Teacher shortages: demand for teachers is high and increasing, but the supply is rapidly decreasing.
  • Are methodologically rigorus
  • Demonstrate positive link between teacher PD and student outcomes
  • Identified common features
Policy implications:
  • Adopt standards for PD
  • Redesign schedules to support collaboration
  • Conduct assessments of teachers' needs
  • Develop expert teachers as mentors and coaches
Today, the kind of education we need, must be available for all; quoting John Dewey: What the best and wisest parent wants for his or her child, that must the community want for all of its children. Any other goal is narrow and unlovely. Acted upon, it destroys our democracy.

Johnson: In Delaware -- with thanks to NASBE -- the systems grants looking at a Standards-Based System; comprehensive approach; how one initiative complements another. Areas of focus on efforts to rethink teaching and learning: 
  • Educator preparation
  • Professional learning
  • Roles for educators
  • Standards and assessment
State Boards utilize:
  • Power of Policy
  • Power of the Question
  • Power to Convene
That's a wrap

Welcome and Plenary

We're in Atlanta for NASBE's 59th Annual Conference. The Conference theme is Moving Beyond the State Plan: Excellence - Equity - Innovation


Presenters: Kris Amundson, NASBE President and CEO; Jack Griffin, Food-Finder (attending by video); Dr. Meria Carstarphen, Superintendent of Atlanta Public Schools; Mike Royal, Georgia Board Chair/Presiding; Jay Barth, NASBE Board Chair

Royal: Welcome. Legislative action for a GA Chief Turnaround Officer, GA/SBE just hired yesterday, NASBE ran the search.

Carstarphen: Welcome to Atlanta. Believes that Education is the cornerstone for our Democracy -- "I have drunk the Kool-Aid". Kids need career skills and decision-making skills and also need to have the heart to be better people than we are to do the work with pride and hope and inspiration and thunder. Important to hear from other Superintendents from beyond your schools for better perspective.

Barth: Thanks members of NASBE Board of Directors. Transformative year, with power shifting back to States. A thrilling time to be working at NASBE with leaders and staff. Food insecure families can be connected to their next meal, via the Food-Finder App, created by high school student, Jack Griffin. 

Griffin: (video) explains how he was inspired to create the app after seeing a video on hunger. His father now takes the stage to say more about Jack's story: Food insecurity is a problem because it's invisible. Rapid rise of technology makes smartphones readily available. Jack figured out how to connect people to food. App is integrated with google maps. Superintendents also integrate with the app, using social media to raise awareness. Top 10 States using the app: Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, California, Michigan, Texas, New York, Alabama, Tennessee, Washington DC.

Amundson: Planning for this COnference began right after last year's. Thanks NASBE staff, asks to stand so attendees can acknowledge. Introduces Robert Hull, NASBE Executive Vice President.

Hull: Provides overview of Conference. Notes Area Meetings happening later today, election of representatives for regions.

Next up: Fostering Excellence, Equity, Innovation

Presenters: David Coleman, President and CEO, The College Board; Sal Khan, Khan Academy; Jonathan Amaya, James Madison University Student; Jay Barth, NASBE Board Chair, Arkansas Board Chair; Kris Amundson, Nasbe President and CEO (moderator).

Amaya: First in his family to attend college. Kris Amundson was his mentor since 7th grade. She was his "reality check". Learned he couldnt get to college if his SAT scores weren't higher. Knew his family couldn't afford SAT prep. Kris pointed him to Khan Academy: "It's FREE". He loved it. Retook the SAT, score had gone up significantly -- he was one of ~75 students to be interviewed for scholarship; he was selected for full scholarship. Quotes Forrest Gump: Life is like a box of chocolates. Be kind. Be positive. Introduces Sal Khan.

Khan: Quick check -- many in the room already familiar with Khan Academy? Either they or their child have used Khan Academy? Now we're watching a video montage of Khan Academy lessons. Lots of laughter. Tells the story of his background how his cousin needed support in math that got him started with videos to support and tutor her, siblings, word gets around...
(Now he's talking Bloom's Taxonomy!)
We're seeing a montage of Khan Academy videos in languages other than English
Exploring ways state board members can achieve a new vision for teaching and learning that supports all students in mastering rigorous content and applying critical thinking skills necessary to succeed in college and careers and contribute to the knowledge economy.

Coleman: The College Board 100 years. We have plenty of assessments; we need more opportunity. Never give someone one chance. PSAT does not tell you your potential, who you are; who you might be, with practice. Test prep free forever through partnership with Khan Academy.
Now were seeing a promo, student perspective, partnership with College Board + Khan. Free resources for every AP class. Through Khan. Broken promises of assessment. Too many inequities, need more opportunities. Cannot rely on virtual learning alone; need a caring adult. Relationships important and necessary. End the war between "college and career" Need choices and power. Talked to employers about required skills. No test can tell whether you are career or college ready. Knowledge matters in civic education. And, BTW, so does free speech. End the insanity of the "Admissions Process". What haappened to faith, family, and fun? INvite young people to one or two things. Asking for 12 is madness. Trying to do everything I can to promote calm and confidence.
Invites Khan and Amaya to join on stage.

Panel now: Coleman, Amaya, Khan, Amundson, Barth
Coleman to Amaya: What shall we do different?
Amaya: Usually, find that people skip through videos to get to the point at the end. Need application to what you are learning. Find that I go to more videos on history instead of blog videos on youtube.

Amundson to panel: Numbers of low income kids to Stanford? Not very many. Would like to hear what you would say to Admissions Office at Stanford?
Khan: Khan and College Board can make progress with kids; need to figure out how to give kids more tools to be motivated to practice, belief that you can go to college like Stanford.
Barth: Rural schools left behind. Students left behind. Leaders can be some barriers. What can we do as citizen leaders?
Coleman: What you did in Arkansas. State supported 4-5 AP courses. Access framework. More kids in Arkansas in AP courses. Opportunities are present.
Khan: Always ask leaders like yourselves; amazing how many are not aware -- or skeptical -- about resources out there. I'd like to work with everyone here to spread to leaders in your state.

Amaya presents Coleman and Khan hats from James Madison University.

End of Session.